Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 73468 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2001 21:04:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 73452 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2001 21:04:07 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Christoph C. Cemper @ Cemper.com" To: Subject: AW: Hi + congrats + Contrib proposal Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:09:35 +0200 Message-ID: <000401c14606$61780c10$ed23bad4@jezzz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C14617.25056FF0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Disposition-Notification-To: "Christoph C. Cemper @ Cemper.com" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C14617.25056FF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi James, i am currently making progress, so that I could just send you all the stuff that you might need for setting up the sample pretty soon. I am not an Axis comitter, so we might need some comitter to perform the checkin to "official" version when the sample proves to be ok and documented well etc... I guess best approach will be a thorough review by you, including smaybe some improvements/fixes/etc.. that might arise while you get into it... what do you think about that? By the way: the whole "authentication"-theme is not yet a subject for me - inter-operable session-handling and context-propagation from call to call is the relevant thing I an currently on... mfg / kind regards, Christoph C. Cemper email: mailto:Christoph@Cemper.com www: http://Christoph.Cemper.com -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Abbott, James STASCO-OTO/72 [mailto:James.L.Abbott@stasco.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. September 2001 12:41 An: 'axis-dev@xml.apache.org' Betreff: RE: Hi + congrats + Contrib proposal Chris... I have the same need as you and this week U have just upgraded to Axis. I am working on SOAP projects using Apache server and VB (6.0 at the moment) clients. I can foresee a need to implement session handling for some of the future products we will be developing, and for this reason I'd like to offer a hand with any development you may need. Skill set would include: Java, VB 6.0. MS Soap toolkit 2.0 SP2. Anything I can do... just let me know. Regards James. -----Original Message----- From: Christoph C. Cemper @ Cemper.com [mailto:christoph@cemper.com] Sent: 25 September 2001 11:34 To: Axis Development (E-Mail) Subject: Hi + congrats + Contrib proposal Hi folks, after working with Apache SOAP i performed a switch to AXIS for the handler-features! Congratulations, as far as I can judge it, AXIS really is a big step from Apache Soap. I am currently working on a sample of a handler that performs processing of the SOAPHeader for implementing a sort of session handling. Reason for that is, that the whole cookie-mechanism for session handling is not supported by other platforms like MS.NET Furthermore performing that meta-info-processing via the SOAPHeader seems much better because of it's protocol transparency. Ok, what I can offer/contribute is that sample including - Java-Code - VB-Code for MS.SOAP Toolkit How would that contribution work? Who will review/checkin the code as soon as it is ready? mfg / kind regards, Christoph C. Cemper email: mailto:Christoph@Cemper.com www: http://Christoph.Cemper.com ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C14617.25056FF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=20 James,
 
i am=20 currently making progress, so that I could just send you all the stuff = that you=20 might need for setting up the sample pretty soon.
 
I am=20 not an Axis comitter, so we might need some comitter to perform the = checkin to=20 "official" version when the sample proves to be ok and documented well=20 etc...
 
I=20 guess best approach will be a thorough review by you, including smaybe = some=20 improvements/fixes/etc.. that might arise while you get into=20 it...
 
what=20 do you think about that?
 
By the=20 way: the whole "authentication"-theme is not yet a subject for me - = inter-operable session-handling and context-propagation from call to = call is the=20 relevant thing I an currently on...

mfg / kind regards,
Christoph C. Cemper

email:    mailto:Christoph@Cemper.com=20
  = www:   =20 http://Christoph.Cemper.com =





 

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Abbott, = James=20 STASCO-OTO/72 [mailto:James.L.Abbott@stasco.com]
Gesendet: = Dienstag,=20 25. September 2001 12:41
An:=20 'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'
Betreff: RE: Hi + congrats + = Contrib=20 proposal

Chris...
 
I=20 have the same need as you and this week U have just upgraded to Axis.=20
I=20 am working on SOAP projects using Apache server and VB (6.0 at the = moment)=20 clients.
I=20 can foresee a need to implement session handling for some of the = future=20 products we will be developing, and for this reason I'd like to offer = a hand=20 with any development you may need.
Skill set would include: Java, VB 6.0.=20 MS Soap toolkit 2.0 SP2.
Anything I can do... just let me know.
Regards
James.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph C. = Cemper @=20 Cemper.com [mailto:christoph@cemper.com]
Sent: 25 = September 2001=20 11:34
To: Axis Development (E-Mail)
Subject: Hi = +=20 congrats + Contrib proposal

Hi = folks,
 
after working=20 with Apache SOAP i performed a switch to AXIS for the=20 handler-features!
 
Congratulations,=20 as far as I can judge it, AXIS really is a big step from Apache=20 Soap.
 
I = am currently=20 working on a sample of a handler that performs processing of the=20 SOAPHeader
for implementing=20 a sort of session handling.
 
Reason for that=20 is, that the whole cookie-mechanism for session handling is not = supported by=20 other
platforms like=20 MS.NET
 
Furthermore=20 performing that meta-info-processing via the SOAPHeader seems much = better=20 because
of = it's protocol=20 transparency.
 
Ok, what I can=20 offer/contribute is that sample including
 
-=20 Java-Code
- = VB-Code for=20 MS.SOAP Toolkit
 
How would that=20 contribution work? Who will review/checkin the code as soon as it is = ready?
 
mfg / kind=20 regards,
Christoph C. = Cemper=20

email:    mailto:Christoph@Cemper.com =
 =20 www:    http://Christoph.Cemper.com =





 
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C14617.25056FF0--