Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 6141 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2001 00:14:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 6132 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2001 00:14:11 -0000 Received: from adsl-63-202-175-210.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO zaks.demon.co.uk) (63.202.175.210) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 14 Jul 2001 00:14:11 -0000 Received: from debian.simonfell.com ([192.168.1.11]) by zaks.demon.co.uk with SMTP (Mailtraq/1.1.5.1167) id ZKS571C51B2 for axis-dev@xml.apache.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:13:25 -0700 From: Simon Fell To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed 0.5 release announcement Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:13:25 -0700 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Hops: 1 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:40:37 -0400, in soap you wrote: >Glen Daniels wrote: >> >> Just an FYI, I do think that Axis interoperability even before the = next >set >> of changes is pretty good at this point. > >I weigh interopability with the various Microsoft implementations = highly. >At the moment, there is a significant regression as compared to soap = 2.2. >The only other published result that I am aware of is Dolphin, and it = shows >a minor regression. > >How does the saying go "you never get a second chance to make a good = first >impression"? > >- Sam Ruby =46WIW, the pocketSOAP results[1] show both SOAP 2.2 & Axis, with Axis looking better than 2.2, but still a few problems. Cheers Simon [1] http://simonfell.manilasites.com/stories/storyReader$100