Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20010702111806.0132d6c8@shell2.ba.best.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:18:06 -0700
To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org, axis-dev@xml.apache.org
From: Rob Jellinghaus <robj@unrealities.com>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/samples/bidbuy reg.lst
In-Reply-To: <OFCFDDCE51.8F033A27-ON85256A7D.005D6964@raleigh.ibm.com >
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Shall I do it? 

Cheers,
Rob

At 12:59 PM 7/2/2001 -0400, Doug Davis wrote:
>putting axis in the package name would be a great idea!
>-Dug
>
>
>Rob Jellinghaus <robj@unrealities.com> on 07/02/2001 12:59:03 PM
>
>Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org
>
>To:   axis-dev@xml.apache.org, axis-dev@xml.apache.org
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/samples/bidbuy reg.lst
>
>
>
>At 08:06 AM 6/29/2001 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> ALL: PLEASE DO NOT use the same package names in the Axis samples as
>>>      the SOAP samples - it can cause people to load the wrong classes
>>>      when both products are in use at the same time.
>>
>>Shouldn't soap and axis be deployed in separate web applications?  The
>idea
>>of putting samples in a classpath global to the servlet should be strongly
>>discouraged.
>
>+1
>
>>Also, I'd like a smooth upgrade path...renaming the samples is (admittedly
>>a small) annoyance.
>
>In general, if package name collision is a concern, why do we just have
>samples.* (and test.*) rather than samples.axis.* and test.axis.*?  It
>*never* occurred to me that I might have to know all of Apache SOAP's
>package names when writing Axis code.
>
>Cheers,
>Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>