Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 52269 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2001 00:33:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 52262 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2001 00:33:37 -0000 Received: from mta8.pltn13.pbi.net (HELO pltn13.pbi.net) (64.164.98.22) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 00:33:37 -0000 Received: from speedball ([216.102.90.148]) by mta8.pltn13.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with SMTP id <0GF5002S9IVXH6@mta8.pltn13.pbi.net> for axis-dev@xml.apache.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:37:58 -0700 From: Rob Jellinghaus Subject: Transport sample package X-Sender: robj@shell2.ba.best.com To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org Message-id: <3.0.1.32.20010618173758.01250730@shell2.ba.best.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Currently samples.transport contains one specific transport sample, the file transport. I am about to convert the TCP transport code into a sample. The question is, what should the package names be? Three choices: 1) Have FileSender, FileListener, TCPSender, TCPListener, etc. all in samples.transport 2) Have two packages: samples.file_transport and samples.tcp_transport 3) Have two packages: samples.transport.file and samples.transport.tcp I recommend #3. Thoughts? I also soon plan to create a gateway / proxy sample, which I would like to call samples.transport.gateway... or is that wrong? Cheers, Rob