Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 6015 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2001 08:19:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 6001 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 08:19:36 -0000 Received: from georgia.yamato.ibm.com (203.141.89.181) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 24 May 2001 08:19:36 -0000 Received: from e022f2n9.jp.ibm.com (d22relay01.yamato.ibm.com [9.68.14.52]) by georgia.yamato.ibm.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4O8JHf407578 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:19:17 +0900 Received: from e022f2n7 (d22hubm7 [9.68.14.51]) by e022f2n9.jp.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.96) with ESMTP id RAA143356 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:19:15 +0900 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: TCP transport, cleaned up To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 14 April 2000 Message-ID: From: "Yuhichi Nakamura" Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 17:18:56 +0900 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D22HUBM7/22/H/IBM(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21 March 2000) at 2001/05/24 05:19:15 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rob, For 2-4 comments, I seemed to confuse you. I'm sorry. Since there is not client-side handler chain sample, I want to see it. This requirement is not intended for particulary you. Rather, someone should prepare. I am not sure, but there is some sample in the latest WSTK. Intermdiary indicates SOAP intermediary which receives a SOAP message and forwards it to the next host. This is one of key concepts of SOAP. I am curious why we do not have the example. Again, this requirement is not intended for you, but someone. Best regards, Best regards, Yuhichi Nakamura IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory Tel: +81-462-73-4668 From: Rob Jellinghaus on 2001/05/24 16:14 Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org, axis-dev@xml.apache.org cc: Subject: Re: TCP transport, cleaned up At 03:02 PM 5/24/2001 +0900, Yuhichi Nakamura wrote: >1. Why do you set the target address to ClientCall object? Setting on >HTTPClient might be natural. In the same manner, user/password are >strange if they indicate HTTP basic auth. Yes, I got confused about this as I was doing it. This is a good plan and I will put it in. >2. Does your stuff work if you have handler chain at the client side? I >think so, but I have not seen client-side handler chain samples. >3. ClientMessage sample is also required hopefully with chain. >4. I also want to see intermediary examples. Are you talking about AdminClient functionality? Are there any other client side handler chain examples I should look at? Everything should work just fine with a client side handler chain given that I didn't touch any of the MessageContext stuff. And what do you mean by "intermediary examples"? Yes, I'm betraying my ignorance here :-) >Anyway, please continue to clean up the code. Working on it! Cheers, Rob