Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 15427 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2001 19:29:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 15122 invoked from network); 17 May 2001 19:29:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO platinum.allaire.com) (63.109.196.16) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 17 May 2001 19:29:00 -0000 Received: from gamebox (namaste.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.162.35]) by platinum.allaire.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id KS34RBB2; Thu, 17 May 2001 15:29:00 -0400 Message-ID: <004d01c0df07$93c37800$0b00a8c0@gamebox> From: "Glen Daniels" To: References: Subject: Re: To-do list / project status Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 15:28:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 I'm on it. --G ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Davis" To: Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 2:13 PM Subject: Re: To-do list / project status > It might be nice to either relate or merge this with the requirements list > that's in the cvs tree since they're related info. > -Dug > > > Glen Daniels on 05/17/2001 12:42:50 PM > > Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org > > To: "'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'" > cc: > Subject: To-do list / project status > > > > > Please check out http://xml.apache.org/~gdaniels/todo.html - this is a > start > at an Axis 1.0 to-do list, which needs edits and fleshing out. I'd like to > get each of these areas a) owned by someone, b) written up in a bit more > detail, and c) moving towards completion, ideally with a rough guess at > scheduling. Ideally this turns into a feature-list, each of which has an > owner, a status (in proc, code complete, unit tested, integrated), and some > documentation. > > Is there stuff that should be on here that isn't (a: yes)? Is what's here > correct? Do you want to take one of these items as yours? > > From a broader perspective, it's now mid-May, and we were hoping to have a > 1.0 release ready by July. If we don't start picking up some serious > momentum, it's not going to happen. > > I think this is a really cool project, and if we do a good job and get it > out in a reasonable timeframe, we will be able to say sometime next year > that we built a full-featured, fast, embeddable SOAP engine that's powering > tons of production applications, including being embedded in several major > J2EE application servers! I want to get there; do you? > > We need to start working like a team on a real project, instead of a bunch > of individuals hacking away. How can we do that? Any advice you can offer > would be appreciated. Some suggestions from my end: > > 1) Let's talk more, both here and in real-time. I'm on #ApacheSOAP on IRC > right now, and plan to hang out there as much as possible for the next > month > or so. If you want to chat about architecture/design/coding on this > project, let's make that the place to do it. We'll log the substantive > conversations and send them to the list. > > 2) Let's organize. The to-do list is a first step, let's keep it going. > If > you're working in a particular area, let the list know what you're doing. > Toward that end, I'd like to suggest that in addition to keeping a list of > who "owns" which areas, that we each send out a weekly status report to the > axis-dev list, just so that everyone knows what we're up to even if we > haven't had time to write up a full spec or check in our code. > > 3) Let's get moving. We need closure on some of the open issues. We need > people to take ownership of these things, and come up with concrete > proposals/code for us to use. It may take an iteration or two to get it > right, that's OK - but we need to get the rest of this system fleshed out > and down on paper. We also need to know our release criteria for 1.0 in a > bit more detail. > > I'm psyched - who's with me? How much time can you put in? What areas do > you want to work on? > > Glen Daniels > Macromedia > Engineering Manager > http://www.macromedia.com/ > Building cool stuff for web developers > > >