Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 63434 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2001 02:20:15 -0000 Received: from mplspop6.mpls.uswest.net (204.147.80.9) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 12 Feb 2001 02:20:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19410 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2001 02:20:24 -0000 Received: from dialupgg153.mpls.uswest.net (HELO pop.mpls.uswest.net) (216.160.16.153) by mplspop6.mpls.uswest.net with SMTP; 12 Feb 2001 02:20:24 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:16:46 -0600 Message-ID: <3A87478E.50083C0D@pop.mpls.uswest.net> From: "George I Matkovits" To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org Reply-To: matkovitsg@uswest.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD {U S WEST.net} (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: License References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N IMHO managers & marketers go for credit, developers are for community building :-). It is the same everywhere, not just at IBM. Most people (those who do not like it :-) even now call it IBM Soap. Regards - George Sam Ruby wrote: > Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > > > Why does the *license* say "based on IBM code" in any > > case? How is that relevant to a license .. I'd vote > > to take it out of the other file too. > > Stolen from the xml-xerces license. > > Aside: > > Apparently those IBMers at the time felt it more important to get > attribution than to build a community. I would advocate that we do not > follow their lead in this matter. > > - Sam Ruby