Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <005001c08c69$957ce960$e65c0209@watson.ibm.com>
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
References: <OFEA01EE55.B02C74D1-ON852569E6.004E6B65@raleigh.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Vote] 1 Msg or 2
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:11:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1 for 2 messages. Life is a mess with 1 message and it
assumes that follow-on handlers won't want to know what
the *original* message was. I like having the original
message and the "current candidate response" around.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>
To: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:37 AM
Subject: [Vote] 1 Msg or 2


> To help move things along, I'd like to propose that
> we VOTE on one of the smaller open issues - one message
> or two in the MessageContext.
> I propose that we have two messages, an incoming and
> an outgoing (or an request and a response - we can
> work on the words after the vote).  From the e-mails
> I think that's where most (not all) people are but
> I'd like to have a formal vote to try to bring this to
> a close.  Committers, if you vote -1 please give a
> details list of reasons why one message would be better
> in an effort to sway us to your side.  Likewise, if you
> vote +1 and can think of reasons why one message just
> won't cut it please let us know of those too.
> -Dug
>