axis-c-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Gentsch>
Subject Re: AW: Guththila vs libxml2
Date Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:47:42 GMT
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:11 +0100, Stadelmann Josef wrote:
> And test and test and be aware that not every client can accept 

:-) So far I was quite happy with it

> per default message-response as large as 65536 bytes 
> (16 bit pointers eventually).

I'll have to re-read your earlier post again (and search through the
list), but generally now with libxml2 I don't have any general troubles
with large data (if consider 900k as "large").

Right now I use this on Linux and Windows (both 32bit normally, few
tests with 64bit).

@Emanuele: Did libxml2 help in your case? Possibly it was a similar
thing ... I still use 1.6.


> Also chunking and streaming
> architectures/implemntation should ring alarm bells.
> Josef
> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Emanuele Benedetti [] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2011 09:43
> An: Apache AXIS C User List
> Betreff: Re: Guththila vs libxml2
> In data 09 febbraio 2011 alle ore 20:00:19, Nandika Jayawardana  
> <> ha scritto:
> > Guththila parser is based on pull model and should be slightly faster  
> > than
> > libxml as explained by the article.  In the last few years, Guththila  
> > became
> > the default parser and hence undergone good amount of testing. Hence, you
> > can use either parser for your usage.
> Some times ago I had to recompile axis2 with libxml2 support rather than  
> Guththila as the latter silently discard messages bigger than 128K. I  
> don't know if the sistuation is changed with the last versions (I'm  
> speaking of a couple of years ago when was just out the axis2c version  
> 1.6).
> SO if you plan to receive messages bigger than that, make some tests.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message