Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93626 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2010 00:45:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2010 00:45:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 42539 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 00:45:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 42496 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 00:45:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache AXIS C User List" Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C User List" Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 42487 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2010 00:45:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:45:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of amra@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.139 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.139] (HELO e9.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:45:46 +0000 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by e9.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1A0aJ5x025715 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:36:19 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1A0jPn5121066 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:45:25 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1A0jPbe018006 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:45:25 -0500 Received: from d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com (d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.229.40]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1A0jOv6017992 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:45:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <27518586.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <27518586.post@talk.nabble.com> To: "Apache AXIS C User List" Cc: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Need suggestions on Axis/c client stub X-KeepSent: 72D0D3FB:AD358040-862576C6:0003DC65; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2FP1 SHF149 July 17, 2009 Message-ID: From: Nadir Amra Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:45:23 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d27ml101/27/M/IBM(Release 8.0.2FP2|June 22, 2009) at 02/09/2010 06:45:24 PM, Serialize complete at 02/09/2010 06:45:24 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As far as the Axis-C++ client, it is recommended for production use....as=20 long as you build the client from the latest code in SVN. But ensure that it supports what you need supported, which is WSDL 1.1 and = SOAP 1.1.=20 Nadir Amra Ashok P wrote on 02/09/2010 11:09:09 AM: > [image removed]=20 >=20 > Need suggestions on Axis/c client stub >=20 > Ashok P=20 >=20 > to: >=20 > axis-c-user >=20 > 02/09/2010 11:09 AM >=20 > Please respond to "Apache AXIS C User List" >=20 >=20 > I want to clear my understandings about axis-c/c++. I got few answers in > email archives and like to understand thoroughly. Newbie to Axis-c.. :) = I > apologize for any repeated questions.=20 >=20 > 1) Can I provide custom mappings for C/C++ data types for code=20 generation > tool? > Wsdl2c/wsd2ws generates the code for xs:string as ?char* (axis-char)?=20 and > ?std::string? respectively. Is there any way to mention mapping like > ?wchar*? or std::wstring (c++) to toolkit considering Unicode enabled > project? Does char* processing problematic in case of Unicode string?=20 >=20 > 2) My requirement is to generate the clients for non-axis web services=20 like > .net, JBOSS-WS, etc. So Is there any limitations for such clients? I=20 believe > all web services can easily consumed with axis/c client considering they > adhere with WSDL specifications.=20 >=20 > 3) As per the documentation, axis-c supports ?ADB? binding for client=20 code > generations and ?none? option for raw xml in/out. Is ADB is efficient to > consume non-axis web services?=20 >=20 > 4) As per analysis, wsdl2c can generate client code for RPC/document=20 literal > styles only. Am I correct? Is there any support available for=20 RPC-encoded > style in near feature? >=20 > 5) Does it mandatory to use axis2.xml? I like all these settings through > code by settings the options ? like settings the protocol ?http? or=20 https > (ssl), port , ssl certificate, client timeout and more. Does such=20 provision > is available in both C/C++ client generated code? >=20 > 6) From the other posting on forum, it?s not clear that ?AXIS2C=5FHOME? > deplorer folder is mandatory or not for client side. Can anybody confirm > this? I agree few Dlls are required for client distribution. I like my > client application (along with client stub) should have small footprint=20 for > distribution, so can I build stub statically for depended libraries like > axiom.dll, axis2=5Fhttp=5Fsender.dll etc? >=20 > 7) Axis-C++ is not recommended for production use. Does I need to test > client generated (stub) for stability considering the recommendation?=20 Any > suggestions on axis-c++ clients to be used on production? Otherwise I=20 need > go with axis-c only. >=20 >=20 > Thanks in advance and appreciate your help. >=20 >=20 > --=20 > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Need- > suggestions-on-Axis-c-client-stub-tp27518586p27518586.html > Sent from the Axis - C++ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >=20