Mailing-List: contact axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C User List" <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of premalal@gmail.com designates
 74.125.92.145 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:subject:references:from:x-url:to:date:in-reply-to:message-id
         :user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
        b=SigtaCj3ugSD8eUaP6SV6cO4o4G9urj128pyIzYVD0KAdWpWV8htffnfqji6InjFky
         p5MTpdxecpRUoeo4HO8pVydA+mh+5CsyuXlYo9NhqgpSsXyiu1t/yktSCOWYBwg3EHIE
         RwSgiSWmdCd0M7GNMCpR+HLJzumBNBmU08G2o=
Sender: Dinesh Premalal <premalal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Axis2/C or Axis-C++
References: <8d38ca0a0902271041g15a4c7f5uc0d9139ee83fb37@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dinesh Premalal <xydinesh@gmail.com>
To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:14:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8d38ca0a0902271041g15a4c7f5uc0d9139ee83fb37@mail.gmail.com> (Sam
 Carleton's message of "Fri\, 27 Feb 2009 13\:41\:43 -0500")
Message-ID: <877i3bzlfr.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com> writes:

> I am new to web services and am wondering which I am better off using: Axis2/C
> or Axis-C++
>
> My preference is to work in C++, I am more comfortable in the OO world, but am
> willing to work with Axis2/C if that is the most current/stable of
> the two.

Regarding Axis2/C , I could say that is the one you could find most
number of WS-* specifications implemented. WS-Addressing,
WS-ReliableMessaging, WS-Evening, WS-Security to name a few. In
addition to that you could have some more additional features, like
apache2 deployment module, large attachment capability, improved axiom
with XPath implementation and so on. 

I could not comment on Axis-C++ since I do not have much experience
with it.

thanks,
Dinesh