Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35614 invoked from network); 17 May 2008 01:33:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2008 01:33:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 97597 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2008 01:33:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 97588 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2008 01:33:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache AXIS C User List" Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C User List" Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 97574 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2008 01:33:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 May 2008 18:33:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of amra@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.145 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.145] (HELO e5.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 May 2008 01:32:42 +0000 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4H1Wvbh009180 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 21:32:57 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4H1Wrva154626 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 21:32:53 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4H1WrFD028950 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 21:32:53 -0400 Received: from d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com (d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.229.40]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4H1WrBE028945 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 21:32:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: To: "Apache AXIS C User List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Axis2/C doc/lit wrapper vs. non-wrapper style X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 Message-ID: From: Nadir Amra Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 20:33:34 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d27ml101/27/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 05/16/2008 08:33:33 PM, Serialize complete at 05/16/2008 08:33:33 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How does axis2/C handle document/literal wrapped vs. unwrapped? Does it support it? What is the default? When I generate client stubs it seems it is always the case that the following is generated: adb_phoneStatusResponse_t* axis2_stub_op_IPTelephonyService_phoneStatusRequest( axis2_stub_t *stub, const axutil_env_t *env, adb_phoneStatusRequest_t* _phoneStatusRequest); Even if I specify -uw So I am curious about the following: (1) When is wrapped vs. unwrapped used? (2) Is there actually a difference in SOAP request between the two? From my readings it seems that this is more of a programming interface aspect than anything else - that is, whether the child elements of the wrapper element are listed as parameters or whether a structure is used. Thanks in advance. Nadir Amra --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org