Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61656 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2005 13:00:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2005 13:00:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 41324 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2005 13:00:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 41303 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2005 13:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache AXIS C User List" Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C User List" Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 41290 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2005 13:00:18 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:00:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_FAIL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of HAWKINSJ@uk.ibm.com designates 195.212.29.137 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.212.29.137] (HELO mtagate4.uk.ibm.com) (195.212.29.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:00:24 -0700 Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8JCxmSU171516 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:59:48 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j8JCxl6u179966 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:59:47 +0100 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8JCxlFw013580 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:59:47 +0100 Received: from d06ml068.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06ml068.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.194]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8JCxl08013572 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:59:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <432A0FEE.6070702@gmail.com> To: "Apache AXIS C User List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Time for 1.6 Alpha? [was Re: server memory leak] X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 From: John Hawkins X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on John Hawkins/UK/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 19/09/2005 13:43:25, Serialize by Notes Client on John Hawkins/UK/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 19/09/2005 13:43:25, Serialize complete at 19/09/2005 13:43:25, S/MIME Sign failed at 19/09/2005 13:43:25: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on D06ML068/06/M/IBM(Release 6.53HF247 | January 6, 2005) at 19/09/2005 13:59:47, Serialize complete at 19/09/2005 13:59:47 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:59:45 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0045E4B180257081_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 0045E4B180257081_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" +1 to 1.6 release. Samisa Abeysinghe 16/09/2005 01:21 Please respond to "Apache AXIS C User List" To Apache AXIS C User List cc Subject Time for 1.6 Alpha? [was Re: server memory leak] Hi all, I noticed in the past week or so, the users are complaining about probelms in 1.5 that we have alredy fixed in the SVN head. Most of the issues are non issues against the current code base. Hence would it be not a good idea to package our 1.6 alpha so that users could try and report bugs against that? I know that we have the nightly builds, but still nice to have an offical release tag here as many assume nightly build to be *very buggy*, which is not true in our case, but still it's a user feeling. We may have to spend some energy to fix the docs in line with the latest chnages, like the server.wsdd changes, but it is still worth IMHO, given the energy that we have to spend to help users fix issues in the older release which are already fixed in the current code. Thoughts please, Thanks, Samisa... Anders Eriksson wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I have a axis-c server working as a mod to apache1.3 > running on windows. For the axis installation I have > used the binary distribution from 20050409 on > http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis-c/: > axis-c-win32-current-bin.zip. > > My problem is that the memory usage for apache > increases after each call to my server. I have made > tests where I return immediately when entering in > any of the functions treating the call (onFault, init, > fini and the webservices function called) to void any > leaks that I might have created self. > > I have also tried to compile the latest cvs version > (mod_axis.dll, AxisServer.dll, HTTPChannel.dll, > HTTPTransport.dll, AxisXMLParser.dll) but the > leak remains. > > Anyone recognizes this problem? > > /Anders > > _________________________________________________________________ > Ladda ner din Nametone till mobilen! http://dl02.cellus.no/sweden/msn2/ > > --=_alternative 0045E4B180257081_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
+1 to 1.6 release.



Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa.abeysinghe@gmail.com>

16/09/2005 01:21
Please respond to
"Apache AXIS C User List"
To
Apache AXIS C User List <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Time for 1.6 Alpha? [was Re: server memory leak]





Hi all,
    I noticed in the past week or so, the users are complaining about
probelms in 1.5 that we have alredy fixed in the SVN head. Most of the
issues are non issues against the current code base.
    Hence would it be not a good idea to package our 1.6 alpha so that
users could try and report bugs against that? I know that we have the
nightly builds, but still nice to have an offical release tag here as
many assume nightly build to be *very buggy*, which is not true in our
case, but still it's a user feeling.
    We may have to spend some energy to fix the docs in line with the
latest chnages, like the server.wsdd changes, but it is still worth
IMHO, given the energy that we have to spend to help users fix issues in
the older release which are already fixed in the current code.

Thoughts please,

Thanks,
Samisa...
Anders Eriksson wrote:

>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a axis-c server working as a mod to apache1.3
> running on windows. For the axis installation I have
> used the binary distribution from 20050409 on
> http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/axis-c/:
> axis-c-win32-current-bin.zip.
>
> My problem is that the memory usage for apache
> increases after each call to my server. I have made
> tests where I return immediately when entering in
> any of the functions treating the call (onFault, init,
> fini and the webservices function called) to void any
> leaks that I might have created self.
>
> I have also tried to compile the latest cvs version
> (mod_axis.dll, AxisServer.dll, HTTPChannel.dll,
> HTTPTransport.dll, AxisXMLParser.dll) but the
> leak remains.
>
> Anyone recognizes this problem?
>
> /Anders
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Ladda ner din Nametone till mobilen! http://dl02.cellus.no/sweden/msn2/
>
>
--=_alternative 0045E4B180257081_=--