Return-Path: 
 <axis-c-user-return-1407-apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive=ws.apache.org@ws.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 95526 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 07:29:15 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 07:29:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 49360 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2005 07:29:15 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-user-archive@ws.apache.org
Received: (qmail 49342 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2005 07:29:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:axis-c-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>
List-Id: "Apache AXIS C User List" <axis-c-user.ws.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C User List" <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-user@ws.apache.org
Received: (qmail 49328 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2005 07:29:14 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of samisa.abeysinghe@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.202 as permitted sender)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.202)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:29:14 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1014402wra
        for <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:29:12 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=Q03Ci7RcYzUUiKYECzGQFXcg6IgUL7sZjZCpFMt9fb3tfk3lHg9xssNxUQcsC/KRDRyQwei6DsjTPklQ0o6ZZi7sJAAYqm1Pqy+k8w8ZgsKedY66S8let49iROvGXdL+XwIrNUOPq2YuRDsyObE87iIP/xFOmvUbxCUtCZoqYTY=
Received: by 10.54.42.76 with SMTP id p76mr145407wrp;
        Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:29:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.28.26 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:29:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a0f0c1480502082329544cd09b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:29:12 +0000
From: Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa.abeysinghe@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa.abeysinghe@gmail.com>
To: Apache AXIS C User List <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Complex array testing [was: Re: Array serialization?]
In-Reply-To: 
 <OF6DF6E362.6E3A8392-ON4A256FA3.001BB27B-4A256FA3.001DB00C@au1.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: 
 <OF6DF6E362.6E3A8392-ON4A256FA3.001BB27B-4A256FA3.001DB00C@au1.ibm.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Do we have a test case to test complex arrays in the test suite?

I had a look and could not find any :(

Samisa...


On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:24:15 +1000, Tim Bartley <tbartley@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
>  
> I am an Axis C++ newbie so please bare with me ... 
>  
> I am having trouble with serialization of an array parameter on the client
> side. 
>  
> The array is of a complex type. 
>  
> The generated stubs create: 
>  
> typedef struct Complex { 
>         xsd__string value1; 
>         xsd__string value2; 
>         xsd__string value3; 
>         xsd__int value4; 
>         Complex(); 
>         ~Complex(); 
> }; 
>  
> typedef struct Complex_ArrayTag { 
>         Complex** m_Array; 
>         int m_Size; 
> }; 
>  
> I can't find any Axis C++ samples using arrays of complex types. 
>  
> I have code similar to the following to initialize the array. 
>  
> Complex* data = new Complex[size]; 
>  
> <initialize data elements> 
>  
> Complex_Array array; 
> array.m_Array = new Complex*[size]; 
> array.m_Size = size; 
> for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) { 
>         array.m_Array[i] = &data[i]; 
> } 
>  
> when I step through the generated Axis_Serialize_Complex function the
> "Complex* param" parameter appears to really be a "Complex** param". This
> results in horrible binary data being included in the request which is then
> generally rejected by the server. 
>  
> Am I setting up my Complex_Array incorrectly or is this a bug? I'm using the
> 1.4 stable release on Linux and have just tried this with the new 1.5 alpha
> with the same result. 
>  
> Regarsd, 
>  
> Tim Bartley 
> --
>  IBM Tivoli Access Manager Development
>  Gold Coast Development Lab, Australia
>  +61-7-5552-4001 phone
>  +61-7-5571-0420 fax