axis-c-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa_abeysin...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [bug fix progress] Why are we releasing?
Date Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:39:14 GMT
I managed to solve AXISCPP-96.

I also closed out few more including 198

Are there any others that we need to look into (apart from AXISCPP-103 (and 89), 192 and 193
which
are being attended by Sanjaya and Mark) before 1.3 release.

Samisa...


--- Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa_abeysinghe@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>    We have made good progress with bug fixes.
> 
>    Today I have closed out:
>  AXISCPP-95
>  AXISCPP-94
>  AXISCPP-64
>  AXISCPP-57
>  AXISCPP-65
> 
>    Accoering to Sanjaya
>  AXISCPP-103 (and 89)
>    seems to be OK with new transport.
>    
>    And we have 
>  AXISCPP-96
>    pending.
> 
> Samisa...
> 
> --- John Hawkins <HAWKINSJ@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > AXISCPP-103
> > AXISCPP-96
> > AXISCPP-95
> > AXISCPP-94
> > AXISCPP-64
> > AXISCPP-57
> > AXISCPP-65
> > 
> > 
> > I would agree with most of them but not 65. This may well be fixed already
> > with some of Fred's recent changes and it's not a sev one - just very
> > annoying !
> > 
> > OK, if that's decided then I suggest that we make sure that if you are
> > working on a JIRA problem then you allocate the problem to yourself in JIRA
> > PRIOR to actually finding a fix i.e. make sure everyone knows not to waste
> > their time trying to fix it because you are already working on it.
> > 
> > I'm offline for a few days (sorry - bad timing!)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > John Hawkins
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >                                                                            
> >              Samisa Abeysinghe                                             
> >              <samisa_abeysingh                                             
> >              e@yahoo.com>                                               To 
> >                                        Apache AXIS C Developers List       
> >              07/10/2004 14:35          <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>        
 
> >                                                                         cc 
> >                                                                            
> >              Please respond to                                     Subject 
> >               "Apache AXIS C           Re: Why are we releasing?           
> >              Developers List"                                              
> >                                                                            
> >                                                                            
> >                                                                            
> >                                                                            
> >                                                                            
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Any others that we need to prioritise for 1.3?
> > 
> > The following are worth looking at and fixing:
> > 
> > AXISCPP-103
> > AXISCPP-96
> > AXISCPP-95
> > AXISCPP-94
> > AXISCPP-64
> > AXISCPP-57
> > AXISCPP-65
> > 
> > I could look at transport and non-Windows stuff in the given order.
> > 
> > I need help looking at Windows specific stuff. (because I have a Linux
> > desktop)
> > 
> > Samisa...
> > 
> > --- John Hawkins <HAWKINSJ@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > OK, well, if there are no dissenters then I think we can say that 1.3 is
> > > using the new transport.
> > > In which case you have no need to tackle the two major defects you were
> > > looking at - 171 & 89 - in the 1.3 drop ?
> > >
> > > In which case we are just waiting for Mark to look into 192 and 193 ?
> > >
> > > Any others that we need to prioritise for 1.3?
> > >
> > > John Hawkins
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >              Samisa Abeysinghe
> > 
> > >              <samisa_abeysingh
> > 
> > >              e@yahoo.com>
> > To
> > >                                        Apache AXIS C Developers List
> > 
> > >              07/10/2004 12:54          <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
> > 
> > >
> > cc
> > >
> > 
> > >              Please respond to
> > Subject
> > >               "Apache AXIS C           Re: Why are we releasing?
> > 
> > >              Developers List"
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes it is a good idea to switch to new transport.
> > >
> > > I think Damitha has already put it in the build for Linux.
> > >
> > > Samisa...
> > >
> > > --- John Hawkins <HAWKINSJ@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And I assume that as we are effectively regressing that we are going to
> > > use
> > > > the new transport?
> > > >
> > > > John Hawkins
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >              Samisa Abeysinghe
> > >
> > > >              <samisa_abeysingh
> > >
> > > >              e@yahoo.com>
> > > To
> > > >                                        Apache AXIS C Developers List
> > >
> > > >              07/10/2004 12:17          <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
> > >
> > > >
> > > cc
> > > >
> > >
> > > >              Please respond to
> > > Subject
> > > >               "Apache AXIS C           Re: Why are we releasing?
> > >
> > > >              Developers List"
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> 
=== message truncated ===



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now. 
http://messenger.yahoo.com

Mime
View raw message