Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4651 invoked from network); 1 May 2008 07:14:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2008 07:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 34078 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2008 07:14:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 34057 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2008 07:14:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 34046 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2008 07:14:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 May 2008 00:14:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.17] (HELO relay03.pair.com) (209.68.5.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 01 May 2008 07:13:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 41322 invoked from network); 1 May 2008 07:13:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 1 May 2008 07:13:28 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 124.43.132.254 Message-ID: <48196DA8.3040704@wso2.com> Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 12:43:44 +0530 From: Kaushalye Kapuruge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060713) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache AXIS C Developers List Subject: Re: More readable LOG Macros. References: <446b20b60804292221r5b3bb4acn147482168df6574e@mail.gmail.com> <918d33e0804300415m15755bai6a5a528fb95837db@mail.gmail.com> <48185891.90607@wso2.com> <878wyu7cuc.fsf@etch.wso2.com> In-Reply-To: <878wyu7cuc.fsf@etch.wso2.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dinesh Premalal wrote: > Kaushalye Kapuruge writes: > >> +1. But when it comes to submodule prefix, could this be a problem? >> Say I need to use prefix >> [rampart][oxs] for OMXMLSecurity and >> [rampart][util] for Utility module etc. >> Would that be a big issue if we give the freedom of passing the prefix? >> > > Is this a standard that we are using [Module][Submodule] prefix ? No there is no such standard but we used to do it in Rampart. > For > me [Module] prefix and file name and number is detailed enough :) Is > there any advantage over logging submodule prefix? > For Axis2/C logs, we didn't use any prefix so far. I think it is better to > continue that for the future as well. > Fine with me. :-) File name + line number would do. Cheers, Kaushalye > thanks, > Dinesh > -- http://blog.kaushalye.org/ http://wso2.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org