Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64508 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 17:08:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2008 17:08:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 5905 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 17:07:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 5893 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 17:07:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 5877 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2008 17:07:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:07:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.15] (HELO relay01.pair.com) (209.68.5.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:07:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 88547 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 17:07:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.202.223.10?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 24 Jan 2008 17:07:21 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 116.12.88.21 Message-ID: <4798C5C2.5060504@wso2.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:37:14 +0530 From: Samisa Abeysinghe User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache AXIS C User List , Apache AXIS C Developers List Subject: Re: version incompatibilities References: <4798C0EF.7030701@ipe.fzk.de> In-Reply-To: <4798C0EF.7030701@ipe.fzk.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Oops! That is a glitch :( We should add this to our check list in the release process Wiki. Devs, should we do a patch release fixing this? I think we should. Thanks, Samisa... Michael Sutter wrote: > Hello list, > > I have found two incompatibilities in version 1.2. First one is in > axutil_version.h. There the AXIS2_MINOR_VERSION is defined as 1 and > should be 2. > > The second one is in axis2.pc config file. If I use pkg-config to find > the correct libraries I think the provided output is not correct: > pkg-config --libs axis2c produces > -L/home/auger/axis2c-1.2.0/lib -laxis2 -lxml2 -lz -ldl > > But there exists no axis2 library. So it produces a error when used > for compiling. The -laxis2 is defined in axis2.pc.in. > > It would be nice if both could be fixed. > > Kind regards > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-user-help@ws.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org