Mailing-List: contact axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of premalal@gmail.com designates
 72.14.204.234 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:subject:references:from:x-url:to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender;
        b=ERxNyeGWFlfPPuOj5APw0y8ryLXpQCCKmQmGuYHr+lETik34VNZOyLgz6JJys7WF5KqABKDbtO4OB/9Kn8MfCjnPhQ3MabLwDiQF6sQHowzmkzgQSbzOLHWfpBWcNbQutyLza40LUieM7lcR0fRJAPKETOR7WElyVSmSPFQwV3Y=
Subject: Re: How to get ordered namespace sequence,
 about the function "axutil_hash_find_entry"
References: <209860.42675.qm@web45307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
From: Dinesh Premalal <xydinesh@gmail.com>
To: axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:25:20 +0530
In-Reply-To: <209860.42675.qm@web45307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> (Kelvin Lin's
 message of "Thu\, 5 Jul 2007 00\:24\:56 -0700 \(PDT\)")
Message-ID: <87k5tfp43b.fsf@etch.wso2.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dinesh Premalal <premalal@gmail.com>

Hi Kelvin,

Kelvin Lin <kelvin_q_lin@yahoo.com> writes:
> I printed both hash value and count and I found the count increased by the
> declare sequence. But if I used fuction "axiom_node_to_string" to see the
> string format of message, I found they are not the same sequence with declaring
> them. As I mentioned, I printed hash value and I didn't found any relationship
> between hash value and output sequence, liking big hash value output firstly.
>  
> In my project doing now, I have to create a soap message with exact sequence of
> the namespace, or it doesn't work. So I would like to know the princle of
> outputing namespace and how to modify the source codes to meet my
> specification, even hard coding in source codes or in the my
> project.
AFAIK, the sequence of namespaces depends on the XML parser and parser
abstraction layer. I think we doesn't have a control over it. Sequence
of namespace doesn't effect validity or welformness of the XML. 

thanks,
Dinesh
-- 
Dinesh Premalal
http://feeds.feedburner.com/Dinesh
GPG ID : A255955C
GPG Key Finger Print : C481 E5D4 C27E DC34 9257  0229 4F44 266E A255 955C

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org