axis-c-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Franz Fehringer <...@isogmbh.de>
Subject Re: last wsdl2ws reorganization / AXISCPP-918
Date Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:21:38 GMT
Thanks, i'll be back on this issue soon.

Franz

Adrian Dick schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Ah!  I was using the wrong view on Jira, so missed your patch first time
> round.
>
> I have now applied and tested the patch using our existing testcases
> without any problems.
> So it has now been committed and should be available in the next nightly
> build.
>
> I do agree that we will need to revisit this patch when we look at
> providing more complete support for extension/restriction of data types,
> including the addition of a specific testcase for this behaviour/function.
>
> I will update AXISCPP-918 to reflect the inclusion of this patch, but I'm
> currently having difficulty connecting to Jira.
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________
> Adrian Dick (adrian.dick@uk.ibm.com)
>
>
> Franz Fehringer <feh@isogmbh.de> wrote on 05/04/2006 15:46:43:
>
>   
>> Hello Adrian,
>>
>> My fix is contained in my comment to AXISCPP-918 (scroll to the bottom of
>>     
>
>   
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-918).
>> It consists of only four lines and copes only with the most simple
>> and special case.
>> But perhaps someone with the knowledge of you could augment it to a
>> more complete solution?
>> For my purposes even this little four lines make a big improvement
>> (i would have to postprocess several generated sources without it).
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Franz
>>
>>
>> Adrian Dick schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> You mention that you have a simple fix ... is this by post processing, or
>> do you have a WSDL2Ws path?
>> If the latter, we would be very grateful if you're in a position to make
>> this available for inclusion to Axis C++.
>>
>> Incidentally, I see from the WSDL attached to AXISCPP-918 that you're
>>     
> using
>   
>> doc/literal.  The latest refactoring basically promoted a few of the
>> cpp/literal classes upto cpp, incorporating a small number of changes for
>> the unavoidable differences between doc/literal and rpc/encoded
>>     
> artefacts.
>   
>> So, I would expect no change in your produced cpp/hpp files (except
>>     
> perhaps
>   
>> minor formatting), while any WSDL2Ws patch files may need to be reworked
>>     
> to
>   
>> the new location - but the patch content is probably still good.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Adrian
>> _______________________________________
>> Adrian Dick (adrian.dick@uk.ibm.com)
>>
>>
>> Franz Fehringer <feh@isogmbh.de> wrote on 05/04/2006 09:23:17:
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> With the last svn up i saw that the wsdl2ws sources got reorganized thus
>> overwriting my simple fix for AXISCPP-918.
>> So i wonder if AXISCPP-918 could perhaps resolved/remedied for the most
>> simple cases?
>> See my last comment to AXISCPP-918.
>> It would be really great for me, if AXISCPP-918 could be attacked (i
>> understand well that not all of my issues can be resolved with 1.6),
>> since this is currently the last and only issue, for which i have either
>> to patch wsdl2ws locally or postprocess the generated sources.
>>
>> Many thanks in advance
>>
>> Franz
>>
>> [attachment "feh.vcf" deleted by Adrian Dick/UK/IBM]
>>
>>
>>
>> [attachment "feh.vcf" deleted by Adrian Dick/UK/IBM]
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message