Mailing-List: contact axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.203 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ERkhn1mp9HnPHLUcoiURZ7F/gjlOv6NFKjYh3EIc67cP8gg1bKN+RaUdj359HXrXb+pnuOUjkg2LFoldPrigGX/CgDnDdjmxRRxk+375QombgIwOWsygd+ywihme4HzcCRUuNuiV532n/TwJwu/E3QOYPz+BnuftXyJfMva4/oA=
Message-ID: <19e0530f0601311237sdad1ce3l94768269f58a3b4f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:37:28 -0500
From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: Apache AXIS C Developers List <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Re: guththila re-entrance
In-Reply-To: <3d3e8b800601311211na6882b9x@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3d3e8b800601260613s5b8fa9bcx@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3d3e8b800601260627q18ae3349p@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1138584786.8239.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <3d3e8b800601311211na6882b9x@mail.gmail.com>

Ed,

You have commit privs. Can u please check in the code yourself? :)

thanks,
dims

On 1/31/06, Edward Slattery <edslattery@googlemail.com> wrote:
> OK, Im now on axis-c-dev. I found some difficulties in building patches, =
so
> I have logged this and 3 other problems on JIRA with details of the chang=
es
> needed.
> I tried to attach patches, but was unable to attach files - some security
> issue that I need to work out.
> I have two other fixes to apply yet, which are compiler warnings for
> signed/unsigned etc. And one bad return value.
> Question about patches- suppose I want to provide patch files for all six=
 of
> my fixes - I guess I cant build one huge patch as that doesnt help you
> decide what to apply - but I also cant apply patch after patch unless you
> know the exact order to apply them - whats the protocol here?
> One big patch with comments showing which parts apply to which problem, o=
r
> an ordered sequence of patches?
>
>
>
> On 30/01/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > Hi Ed,
> >
> > This would be a *very* useful update! Please go ahead and patch it ...
> >
> > BTW this discussion belongs in axis-c-dev and not here.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 14:27 +0000, Edward Slattery wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I dont know where to log this one - anyone want to tell me if its a
> > > problem or I am doing something wrong?
> > >
> > > I am testing the Guththila parser, and have a WSDL which contains an
> > > <import> of an XSD.
> > >
> > > I have one single guththila environment, and create a new parser for
> > > each file encountered.
> > >
> > > Guththilla cannot handle that because guththila_event is global, and
> > > the inner parse fails because of handling the wrong event
> > > type (the GUTHTHILA_EMPTY_ELEMENT from the outer parse.)
> > >
> > > By putting the guththila_event inside the parser structure, and
> > > replacing every occurence (18 in all) of guththila_event with
> > > parser->guththila_event, I can successfully re-enter and parse nested
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Would that be a useful update?
> >
> >
>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/