Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11595 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2005 16:46:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2005 16:46:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 35645 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2005 16:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 35625 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2005 16:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 35611 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2005 16:46:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from fw.macrovision.com (HELO min.macrovision.com) (192.156.198.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:46:27 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Axis c++ 1.5 release plan (draft 4) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:46:25 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Axis c++ 1.5 release plan (draft 4) Thread-Index: AcUEaERvTrKRgoKZTkKdz4plxZFIswAJTkFQ From: "Carsten Blecken" To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" , "Samisa Abeysinghe" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sorry for the mess everybody - I assumed friday to be the last day (my = mistake). In terms of things already committed : These are changes to the = serializer which add namespace and/or namespace prefixes to various methods. They are = overloaded methods to keep backward compatibility with current stubs. So I would = say the risk is not too big. There was also some refactoring being done, but I = did some testing on the changes. The part where I need more time are the stub/skeleton generator (which = employ the new methods) and the testing involved with it. Maybe I should hold off the generator changes until after alpha, since I = consider them higher risk? In terms of importance: Our current wsdl's break due to the lack of = namespace=20 prefixing. Almost all more complicated doc lit wsdl's will have issues = here when they have data type nesting and arrays. Carsten -----Original Message----- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:samisa.abeysinghe@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 3:37 AM To: Apache AXIS C Developers List Subject: Re: Axis c++ 1.5 release plan (draft 4) Part of the solution has been already commited. So we have to either hold off or comment out what is already commited. How critical/important is this feature?=20 Is it practicle to tag the CVS and start on testing cycle till the rest of the solution is commited. Given that the solution is related to serializer, the risk of side effects is high. Thanks, Samisa... On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:16:35 +0000, John Hawkins = wrote: >=20 > Hmm,=20 >=20 > Should we hold off on alpha until it's complete?=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > John Hawkins >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > "Carsten Blecken" =20 >=20 > 27/01/2005 08:39=20 > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C Developers List" > To"Apache AXIS C Developers List" , > =20 > cc > SubjectRE: Axis c++ 1.5 release plan (draft 4) >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Sanjaya,=20 > =20 > still working on item 7). Harder than I thought. Partially committed > (Serializer changes) and I think I can get the rest=20 > (code generator) by friday into the alpha.=20 > =20 > Do you want status by friday again?=20 > =20 > Carsten=20 > =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: sanjaya singharage [mailto:sanjayas@opensource.lk] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:30 PM > To: Apache AXIS C Developers List > Subject: Axis c++ 1.5 release plan (draft 4) >=20 > Hi all,=20 >=20 > COULD I HAVE THE STATUS OF ITEM NUMBER 7 CARSTEN, IS IT ALREAD = COMMITED IN > CVS? CAN WE INCLUDE IT IN 1.5 OR SHELF IT FOR THE NEXT RELEASE? OR ARE = YOU > PLANNING TO FIX THIS BY 1.5 FINAL? COULD I HAVE A RESPONSE CARSTEN?=20 >=20 > =20 > MARK, WHAT IS THE STATUS OF ITEM 2? COULD YOU ALSO RESPOND?=20 > =20 >=20 > Following the discussion I have added these items=20 > -Problem with complex types which contain complex types > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-197 (in progress by = carsten)=20 >=20 > Following the discussion I have removed the following items=20 >=20 > -Fault mapping (stub level) > -improvement of Web Site=20 > a.Web-site should be made more or less like Axis-Java website for ease = of > use=20 > b.More user oriented and less developer oriented=20 > -Add support for xsd:any type (?)=20 > -Ability to add custom headers (?)=20 >=20 >=20 > sanjaya.=20 >=20 > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 >=20 > (fourth draft of the release plan.)=20 >=20 > Hi all, > I would like to volunteer to be the release manager for the Axis C++ = 1.5 > release.=20 >=20 > A draft Release Plan is presented below using the current items found = in the > wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/AxisC_2b_2b/ToDo1.5 .=20 > Please update the wiki of any more items that are applicable to the = 1.5 > release that developers are working on.=20 >=20 > Also we need to decide on dates for code freeze etc. and release dates = at > the bottom.=20 > Please comment.=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > This is the release plan (draft) for Axis C++ version 1.5. Given below = is a > snapshot > of all the changes for 1.5 since the 1.4 version. >=20 > Changes from 1.4 to 1.5: >=20 > 1. Partial C support - > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-210 (in progress by Mark) > -C clients with stub generation for simple types > -Porting of some C++ tests to C=20 > 2. Memory clean-up and fix - > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-149 (in progress by Mark > Whitlock as per JIRA)=20 > 3. Improve HTTP Support - > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-176 (Done by Samisa as = per > JIRA)=20 > 4. "100 Continue" support in axis2 transport > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-311 (Done by Samisa)=20 > 5. Proxy support for axis2 transport > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-325 (Done by Samisa)=20 > 6. Numerous memory leak fixes (Done by Samisa)=20 > 7. Problem with complex types which contain complex types > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-197 (in progress by = Carsten)=20 >=20 > Details on these features could be found on JIRA and the AxisCpp TODO = wiki > page at http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/AxisC_2b_2b/ToDo1.5 >=20 > Release Criteria: >=20 > - Functional tests pass > - Test on installation procedures > - Test on different versions of Apache web server(1.3.xx, 2.0.xx) > - Test samples on different platforms (Linux, Microsoft Windows) > - Fix blockers and most critical bugs that applies to 1.5 >=20 > Dates: >=20 > The following are the proposed dates for the release, opinions please: > Code freeze January 27, 2005 > Release alpha version January 31, 2005 > Release 1.5 final February 21, 2005 >=20 >=20 > sanjaya.=20 >