axis-c-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adrian Dick <adrian.d...@uk.ibm.com>
Subject Re: Fw: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit: ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
Date Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:27:28 GMT





+1 to option 2.
_______________________________________
Adrian Dick (adrian.dick@uk.ibm.com)


Mark Whitlock/UK/IBM@IBMGB wrote on 13/01/2005 11:18:14:

>
>
>
>
> +1 to option 2
>
> Mark Whitlock
> IBM
>
> ----- Forwarded by Mark Whitlock/UK/IBM on 13/01/2005 11:16 -----
>

>              Samisa Abeysinghe

>              <samisa.abeysingh

>              e@gmail.com>
To
>                                        Apache AXIS C Developers List

>              13/01/2005 11:06          <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>,

>                                        susantha@opensource.lk

>
cc
>              Please respond to

>               "Apache AXIS C
Subject
>              Developers List"          Re: Removing generetd source from

>                                        cvs [was:Re: cvs commit:

>
ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/roun
>                                        d1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]

>

>

>

>

>

>

>
>
>
>
> Looks like we have two views:
> 1. Keep generated code for some samples in CVS and remove the rest,
> including all that of tests
> 2. Remove all generated code for all samples and tests and put
> generated code for samples only when packaging releases
>
> What are we going to do?
>  BTW, I prefere 2.
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:46:13 +0600, Susantha Kumara
> <susantha@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > I agree with Roshan to keep the generated source code for some simple
> > samples. But not for all the samples.
> >
> > Susantha.
> >
> >
> > Roshan Weerasuriya wrote:
> > hi All,
>
> In my openion I think for the Samples it is better to keep the
> > generated
> code in the CVS, as the name itself implies that these are
> > samples, so
> there should be the sample codes/source_files to the user. (It
> > is
> certainly true that a user can generate these through the tool, but
> > we
> need to make the life simple for any kind of first time user of Axis
> > C++
> so that he will be encouraged to use Axis C++) We have to retain
> > the
> first time users of Axis C++, and we auctualy should let them feel
> > that
> Axis C++ is not much of a burden to be used.
>
> Roshan
>
> On Wed,
> > 2005-01-12 at 16:43, Damitha Kumarage wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:22:19 +0600, sanjaya singharage wrote
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Dick"
> > <adrian.dick@uk.ibm.com>
> To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> > <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:50
> > PM
> Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs
> > commit:
> ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
>
>
> >
>
>
> "sanjaya singharage" <sanjayas@opensource.lk> wrote on 12/01/2005
> > 09:34:14:
>
> > For a release of course we can proivde the source for the samples
> > generated
>
> > with the tool of that release. Otherwise I guess we will making new
> > uses
> life more difficult.
>  True, but they're going to need to generate the
> > stubs for themselves at
> some point. Doing this as part of the samples seems
> > a natural part of the
> education. (particularly as we'll be confident of
> > these working first
>  time
>
> > and everytime)
>
>  Yes I think you have a point. As you say generating code
> > should be a
> "natural part". Agreed.
>  FYI
> I have seen some guru saying
> > somewhere that "when testing with an application
> for usability in the first
> > few minutes if you cannot make a sample running
> successfully then stop
> > cosidering it as an option." I don't know how true this
> is. But it has some
> > thing in it. Shall we get some burden of it in our
> deployment process and
> > let new user have some relief. Of cousre he will
> generated the stuff and go
> > deeper in the next step
>
> thanks
> damitha
>
>
> > sanjaya.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Dick"
> > <adrian.dick@uk.ibm.com>
> To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> > <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:21
> > PM
> Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs
> > commit:
> ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
>
>
> >
>
>
> My opinion is that we should also remove them from samples, certainly
> > in
>
> > CVS. Maybe we need to ensure the samples documentation has
> > clear
> instructions for the users on generating stubs from the WSDL.
>
>
> > --
> Damitha Kumarage
> hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd(Web:
> > www.hsenid.com)
> damitha@hsenid.lk(damitha@beyondm.net)
>
> Lanka Software
> > Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk)
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>


Mime
View raw message