axis-c-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Susantha Kumara <susan...@opensource.lk>
Subject Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit: ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
Date Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:46:13 GMT
I agree with Roshan to keep the generated source code for some simple 
samples. But not for all the samples.

Susantha.

Roshan Weerasuriya wrote:

>hi All,
>
>In my openion I think for the Samples it is better to keep the generated
>code in the CVS, as the name itself implies that these are samples, so
>there should be the sample codes/source_files to the user. (It is
>certainly true that a user can generate these through the tool, but we
>need to make the life simple for any kind of first time user of Axis C++
>so that he will be encouraged to use Axis C++) We have to retain the
>first time users of Axis C++, and we auctualy should let them feel that
>Axis C++ is not much of a burden to be used. 
>
>Roshan
>
>On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 16:43, Damitha Kumarage wrote:
>  
>
>>On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:22:19 +0600, sanjaya singharage wrote
>>    
>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Adrian Dick" <adrian.dick@uk.ibm.com>
>>>To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
>>>Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:50 PM
>>>Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit:
>>>ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"sanjaya singharage" <sanjayas@opensource.lk> wrote on 12/01/2005
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>09:34:14:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>For a release of course we can proivde the source for the samples
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>generated
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>with the tool of that release. Otherwise I guess we will making new uses
>>>>>life more difficult.
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>True, but they're going to need to generate the stubs for themselves at
>>>>some point.  Doing this as part of the samples seems a natural part of the
>>>>education.  (particularly as we'll be confident of these working first
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>time
>>>      
>>>
>>>>and everytime)
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Yes I think you have a point. As you say generating code should be a
>>>"natural part". Agreed.
>>>      
>>>
>>FYI 
>>I have seen some guru saying somewhere that "when testing with an application
>>for usability in the first few minutes if you cannot make a sample running
>>successfully then stop cosidering it as an option." I don't know how true this
>>is. But it has some thing in it. Shall we get some burden of it in our
>>deployment process and let new user have some relief. Of cousre he will
>>generated the stuff and go deeper in the next step
>>
>>thanks
>>damitha
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>>sanjaya.
>>>>>
>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: "Adrian Dick" <adrian.dick@uk.ibm.com>
>>>>>To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:21 PM
>>>>>Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit:
>>>>>ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>My opinion is that we should also remove them from samples, certainly
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>in
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>>CVS.  Maybe we need to ensure the samples documentation has clear
>>>>>>instructions for the users on generating stubs from the WSDL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>--
>>Damitha Kumarage
>>hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd(Web: www.hsenid.com)
>>damitha@hsenid.lk(damitha@beyondm.net)
>>
>>Lanka Software Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk)
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>  
>


Mime
View raw message