axis-c-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roshan Weerasuriya <ros...@opensource.lk>
Subject Re: Fw: CallBase class required?
Date Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:16:11 GMT
I am not sure , but as I can remember this CallBase was added to provide
C support at a earlier stage. Susantha can comment on this and correct
me if I am wrong.

Roshan 

On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 16:07, John Hawkins wrote:
> +1 - including good overall sentiment :-)
> 
> John Hawkins
> 
> 
> 
> Samisa Abeysinghe <samisa.abeysinghe@gmail.com> wrote on 17/01/2005
> 10:03:24:
> 
> > I am not aware of the original need for CallBase class.
> > As it sounds, removal of this class would not have an impact on C
> > support - am I correct?
> > 
> > In addition to simplifying external API, it also helps in
> maintanance
> > - e.g. yesterday I happen to go though CallBase and Call classes in
> > order to undestand memory managment with initialize and
> unInitialize.
> > True that CallBase is virtual - but is waste time, especially when
> you
> > are already confused enough with memory managment complexities ;-)
> > Axis C++ is a *large* product now and all those small times wasted
> do
> > count :-)
> > 
> > I would like to minimise maintanance effort through all possible
> means.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Samisa...
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:35:35 +0000, Mark Whitlock
> > <mark_whitlock@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > What was the CallBase class needed for originally? I can't see a
> need for
> > > it now, so I would prefer it was removed to simplify the external
> API. Also
> > > while it is still there the C binding generator will generate C
> bindings
> > > for it which seems wrong.
> > > Mark
> > > Mark Whitlock
> > > IBM
> > > 
> > > ----- Forwarded by Mark Whitlock/UK/IBM on 17/01/2005 09:32 -----
> > > 
> > >             Samisa Abeysinghe
> > >             <samisa.abeysingh
> > >             e@gmail.com>                                          
> To
> > >                                       Apache AXIS C Developers
> List
> > >             17/01/2005 09:30          <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org>
> > >                                                                  
> cc
> > > 
> > >             Please respond to                                    
> Subject
> > >              "Apache AXIS C           CallBase class required?
> > >             Developers List"
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > With pure C++ engine in place, do we still need CallBase class?
> > > 
> > > Samisa...
> > > 
> > >


Mime
View raw message