Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43896 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 09:53:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 09:53:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 36846 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2004 09:53:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-c-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 36832 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2004 09:53:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 36816 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2004 09:53:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,EXCUSE_3 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.212.29.135] (HELO mtagate2.uk.ibm.com) (195.212.29.135) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:53:44 -0800 Received: from d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.129]) by mtagate2.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAH9rdpN304856 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:53:39 GMT Received: from d06ml068.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id iAH9re6Y184312 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:53:41 GMT In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options To: Apache AXIS C Developers List X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 Message-ID: From: Fred Preston Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:54:42 +0000 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D06ML068/06/M/IBM(Release 6.51HF338 | June 21, 2004) at 17/11/2004 09:57:12 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi John, SSL does not require these parameters as it is the transport type defined in the URL that determines if the connection is secure. For example, if the communication is secure, then the URL begins "https://...". If the URL begins "http://..." then it is not secure. No other parameters are required to be passed to be able to determine whether to use a secure or unsecure channel. Regards, Fred Preston. John Hawkins To: Fred Preston/UK/IBM@IBMGB 17/11/04 09:30 cc: Subject: Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options(Document link: Fred Preston) Fred, do you use these options on Call? John Hawkins Samisa Abeysinghe To Apache AXIS C Developers List 17/11/2004 09:27 cc Please respond to Subject "Apache AXIS C Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options Developers List" In the Call class we have: int AXISCALL initialize(PROVIDERTYPE nStyle, int secure); and int openConnection(int secure); The secure parameters in these methods are not used at all. Ideally they have to be removed from the code to avoid confusion. The WSDL tool option must have been based on these parameters. Thanks, Samisa... --- Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > I have seen this secure option in the code and I think they are no more operational. > > There was an effort for SLL implementation in 1.0 (and may be in 1.1) and this option was for > that. But later this was deprecated by the new transport astract layer desing and this option is > no more valid with the new transport desing we have. > > As the latest efforts on SSL support is independent of the generated code (which is the correct > way to support channel security) I think we can very safely get rid of this WSDL2Ws tool option. > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > --- John Hawkins wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, does anyone know where these came from or what they do? > > > > > > John Hawkins > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB > > MGB To > > axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org > > 16/11/2004 13:32 cc > > > > Subject > > Please respond to SSL WSDL2Ws options > > "Apache AXIS C > > Developers List" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > there are some options on WSDL2ws for ssl -> > > > > -c channel security (ssl|none) - default is none > > > > What do they do? Why does a user have to decide at this time whether their > > service is securty enabled or not? Sounds wrong to me? > > > > cheers, > > John. > > > > John Hawkins > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! > http://my.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com