Return-Path: 
 <user-return-2489-apmail-avro-user-archive=avro.apache.org@avro.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-avro-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-avro-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02CD110CD5
	for <apmail-avro-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sun,  9 Jun 2013 16:21:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 75540 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2013 16:21:19 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-avro-user-archive@avro.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75186 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2013 16:21:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@avro.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@avro.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@avro.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@avro.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.avro.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@avro.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@avro.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75178 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2013 16:21:15 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:21:15 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of static.void.dev@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:21:08 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ma3so986310pbc.35
        for <user@avro.apache.org>; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date
         :to:mime-version:x-mailer;
        bh=tkw501SZDJmhAwIBLlLXDloF9sX05wuPn8HLzz17U+0=;
        b=sOUAOcsglp/YK0vA4JNAZQ5t81Z5YebhM/+KoUlyrkeoDLyO1GqaLgY6HxK2UfZglN
         YuBY4De1oGnVoyAKFJhM8XhpKF9894X1cMg9Kehc7q2p0HDzBbqIy1Naop8dC+EtEKWQ
         Iez+yKVUGwizummQ6Ed6WXxyfF+wDUpVeUQyeb8x3doUyFJQ+PaDBY1oHRxgVNRuGdc1
         N0jK3qWBMomTJ3OhRYtA1PCQF5JJj4q0x72OVEdfEeN2Uc3aM1DKySVz2ZGbW/FTbJww
         C1dbUyeXG2zQZR7bdMwx/Ys/2izXBB0aV8+Za4p27KWTTwQA8i5aOZCIn86Fs2z//2bf
         2G9A==
X-Received: by 10.68.245.200 with SMTP id xq8mr6797738pbc.32.1370794846932;
        Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.6] (c-67-180-56-114.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
 [67.180.56.114])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iq6sm1718223pbc.1.2013.06.09.09.20.44
        for <user@avro.apache.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark <static.void.dev@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Avro Ruby RPC over Rest
Message-Id: <5E0ED1AC-35FB-44F3-8DCE-BD2EBC1C45AF@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 09:20:42 -0700
To: "user@avro.apache.org" <user@avro.apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

What are the benefits of using Avro RPC in ruby over a more traditional =
Rest approach? Without the benefits of auto code generation giving you =
automatic marshalling/unmarshalling from message to Ruby classes I don't =
see the benefit.


Anyone using Ruby RPC in a production environment? If so you would mind =
sharing your experiences?=