Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-avro-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-avro-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E12FEE8B4 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86189 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2013 22:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-avro-user-archive@avro.apache.org Received: (qmail 85981 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2013 22:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@avro.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@avro.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@avro.apache.org Received: (qmail 85969 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2013 22:15:13 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:15:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vc0-f180.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:15:13 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m17so796186vca.11 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:15:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.76.103 with SMTP id j7mr3579662vdw.90.1363299312085; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.188.14 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:15:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5141BCE1.7040806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <5141BCE1.7040806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:15:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Avro and Hadoop 2 From: Doug Cutting To: user@avro.apache.org, rodrigo.trujillo@linux.vnet.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, Avro works with Hadoop 2.x. If you're using Avro's Mapreduce APIs then you need to use the version of these compiled against Hadop 2.x, e.g.: org.apache.avro avro-mapred 1.7.4 hadoop2 http://s.apache.org/AvroHadoop2 Doug On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Rodrigo Trujillo wrote: > Hi all, > > does Avro supports Hadoop 2.X ?? > I wonder if some tests were done already. > > Regards, > > Rodrigo Trujillo >