Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avro.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@avro.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGHyZ6+JLm4-PuF1vDGfqoOWSeTBPCq8=5uZPNw66S4m7gR3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGHyZ6+JLm4-PuF1vDGfqoOWSeTBPCq8=5uZPNw66S4m7gR3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: suraj acharya <suraj.spa@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 13:30:27 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFK5+R+VHSV2YH2c9Eynanafe0PZvrQFfCQa1pON39b10aNO1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] turn on gitbox and prioritize github contributions?
To: dev@avro.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1ce9c498f974054ecb169e
archived-at: Fri, 05 May 2017 18:30:53 -0000

--94eb2c1ce9c498f974054ecb169e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

1) Yes I agree on using the GitHub for code review.
2) And if we wish to actively encourage it, we would need to update our
contribution wiki.
3) Also, I dont want to stop people from submitting patches, so for the
time being I would say lets keep both running.
4) I would say, lets continue to use JIRA. We have significant history
present here. Moving to issues might need to fine-tune the workflow out
there.

S

-Suraj Acharya

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Hi folks!
>
> Infra now offers read/write access to github via a service called
> 'gitbox'[1]. PMCs have the option to join the service and then make
> use of whichever github features they want.
>
> Personally, I find PR management via the github interface way faster
> than other options. In particular, since it has a usable mobile
> interface I'm able to use commute time to do reviews via it.
>
> What do folks think about
>
> 1) opting in generally
>
> 2) using github PRs directly
>
> 3) actively encouraging our community to switch to github PRs
>
> 4) using github issues
>
>
> [1]: https://gitbox.apache.org/
>
> --
> busbey
>

--94eb2c1ce9c498f974054ecb169e--