avro-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From suraj acharya <suraj....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.8.2 RC2
Date Fri, 07 Apr 2017 18:51:39 GMT
The vote for the RC has been closed!

With a -1 from a member of the PMC the vote has failed.

AVRO-2018 has been filed to work on the issue.
I will work on it and try to get another RC in the next few weeks.

Thanks a lot for taking your time to help vote.

-Suraj Acharya

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> -1
>
> I agree with Niels. We should fix the file header before releasing.
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Niels Basjes <Niels@basjes.nl> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > NOTE: I'm at the Hadoop Summit in Munchen Germany with limited tools (and
> > limited power for my laptop) here.
> >
> > I did a git clone of the avro code based and checked out the project at
> > commit
> > 6bbcf7658e31cd7e92c459300fd70263b9b89de6
> >
> > I found a simple problem that needs to be fixed:
> > Running ./build.sh rat reveals a build failure caused by a missing
> > copyright comment in
> > lang/java/avro/src/test/java/org/apache/avro/TestFixed.java
> >
> > Niels Basjes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Harsha <avro@harsha.io> wrote:
> >
> >> Sean,
> >>      Agree on most of points made here. I am new to the avro project but
> >> also active committer/PMC in other apache projects.
> >> I understand that contributors can help getting the reviews up to the
> >> speed but at the end of the day patches need to be merged
> >> in to make it into the release.
> >> There are quite a few patches with reviews available but not much
> activity
> >> in-terms of merging or any further feedback. I am happy to help
> >> wherever I can. I’ll open a new thread for further discussion on this.
> >>
> >> To get back on track of voting.
> >>
> >> 1. Ran unit tests 1.8.2 rc tag
> >> 2. Verified signature of artifacts
> >> 3. Tested avro-java module
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 (non-binding).
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Harsha
> >>
> >> On Apr 5, 2017, 2:29 PM -0700, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>,
> wrote:
> >> > Personally, I think it's more important that we get back on our
> >> > footing for release cadence. There are already a ton of things in the
> >> > 1.8.2 RC. We can parallelize trying to get the other noted items
> >> > reviewed and then include them in a 1.8.3 release later (say with a
> >> > goal of next month).
> >> >
> >> > I don't want to hijack Suraj's VOTE thread, but the two things we most
> >> > need right now are 1) a release cadence we can use to set expectations
> >> > about when something that's been merged will see the light of day and
> >> > 2) more active reviewers. We're a volunteer run project, so our finite
> >> > supply of folks times has to be applied to both of these if we want to
> >> > succeed. If we hold up getting releases out for the work of recovering
> >> > our review bandwidth we'll perpetually be stuck with no releases.
> >> >
> >> > Due to the project's structure, only committers can help out with the
> >> > release machinery (and thanks a ton for taking this on Suraj!).
> >> > However, any contributor who has a spare hour here or there can help
> >> > out with reviews. For example, it takes much less effort for me as a
> >> > committer to go through patches once I see someone else has already
> >> > provided feedback, especially if it's someone who's been making a
> >> > habit of it.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Harsha <avro@harsha.io> wrote:
> >> > > Suraj,
> >> > > There are further comments on this JIRA https://issues.apache.org/
> >> jira/browse/AVRO-1885 to include additional patches in the release.
> >> > > It looks like the patch-merge process is really slow in Avro. But
It
> >> would good to pick the patches raised by other users in the JIRA.
> >> > > Can we do a cut with those patches in.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Harsha
> >> > >
> >> > > On Apr 5, 2017, 1:50 PM -0700, suraj acharya <suraj.spa@gmail.com>,
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > +1 Non binding
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Suraj Acharya
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Suraj Acharya <suraj@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi everyone,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache
> Avro
> >> 1.8.2
> >> > > > > release.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The commit id is 6bbcf7658e31cd7e92c459300fd70263b9b89de6
> >> > > > > * This corresponds to the tag: release-1.8.2-rc2
> >> > > > > * https://s.apache.org/avro-1.8.2-rc2
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> >> > > > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/avro/avro-1.8.2-rc2/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > You can find the KEYS file here:
> >> > > > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/avro/KEYS
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Binary artifacts for Java are staged in Nexus here:
> >> > > > > * https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheavro-1010/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > This release includes:
> >> > > > > * A spec for single-message Avro encoding and a Java
> implementation
> >> > > > > * Java: Bug fixes for Java logical types
> >> > > > > * Java: Support for Decimal with specific classes
> >> > > > > * Ruby: A fix for compatibility when using snappy
> >> > > > > * Python 3: Updated to use the standard module-level logging
> >> pattern
> >> > > > > * C++: Support for Boost >= 1.59
> >> > > > > * And more bug fixes...
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Please download, verify, and test. This vote will remain
open
> for
> >> at least
> >> > > > > 72 hours. Given sufficient votes, I would like to close
it on or
> >> about 9AM
> >> > > > > PDT on Wednesday, 12 April 2017.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Avro 1.8.2
> >> > > > > [ ] +0
> >> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Suraj Acharya
> >> > > > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > busbey
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> >
> > Niels Basjes
>
>
>
> --
> busbey
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message