Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-avro-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-avro-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D48D18F54 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22266 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2015 08:32:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-avro-dev-archive@avro.apache.org Received: (qmail 22207 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2015 08:32:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avro.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@avro.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avro.apache.org Received: (qmail 22194 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2015 08:32:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 08:32:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 242FFC070B for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:32:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVObqKp2HQQP for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CD5AF4BB89 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wifm2 with SMTP id m2so11276858wif.1 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 01:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=zt6pE1KJViuLDhSyh6NfaUX8mH/8jQSqspAO3saaIZg=; b=Qr3Wyg/lwr7rzUUKMJNoRqhodnbK0S/78KFsqOhcZxQlyA/f6Se+l8uwiSlCcTxP+y IhjL8LOOE3s/YZIJnmwbyPsU0szNwl36xoidB3wtEiR3OSpGhTO7nnO3NvHYc9RDRzM0 aqs9hVoLUx5zRlbd8FPJcbRxpwdO/Q4nZ4Ncf7PVGm0aGN7vlMWhAvVOyWic1GrEwsdD tyD7pFDeCXk+O38vtFjJkaQS3vQ56nvY68SkA0L7TtMQV49p/CqyUXPS3aS2Y6HMne66 s9QBSPf1muOMo7o4ms8wrbjsejF1IEm+tntgV5z0/2ErKp9nVXfwmN+IjAAxdu/2G3sV +GLg== X-Received: by 10.180.84.194 with SMTP id b2mr114794984wiz.36.1436430677820; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 01:31:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.62.47 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 01:30:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Thomas Sanchez Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:30:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Next Avro release To: dev@avro.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Sorry to bust in, but if one could take a final look at AVRO-1663, I'd appreciate. It is a minor fix. Thanks, 2015-07-07 17:16 GMT+02:00 Sean Busbey : > I have done non-binding reviews on the following, if a committer could take > look: > > * AVRO-1645 > * AVRO-1693 > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Tom White wrote: > >> Committers - please take a look at the outstanding patch available >> JIRAs for 1.7.8/1.8.0 and review and commit any that you'd like to see >> in 1.8.0: >> >> http://s.apache.org/xXz >> >> Thanks! >> Tom >> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tom White wrote: >> > Thanks Niels. Comments inline. >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Niels Basjes wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I would say go for the 1.8.0 >> >> >> >> Note that there are a few issues that seem appropriate to include for >> >> this one because they relate to a change in 'backwards compatibility": >> >> >> >> - AVRO-1586 Build against Hadoop 2 >> >> ( which should also fix AVRO-1453 Release version of avro-tools >> >> compiled against hadoop2 ) >> >> - AVRO-1559 Drop support for Ruby 1.8 >> > >> > I've committed both of these now. >> > >> >> >> >> On a personal note I would like a 'Yes, commit' / 'No, won't fix' >> >> choice from you guys regarding this proposal (Patch included): >> >> AVRO-1633 Add additional setXxx(Builder) method to make user code >> >> more readable. >> > >> > I think this is a "won't fix" as it doesn't seem to produce any real >> > increase in readability and could actually be confusing. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tom >> > >> >> >> >> Niels Basjes >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Tom White wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >> >>> >> >>> It would be good to do another Avro release soon. I'm happy to create >> >>> a release candidate so we can vote on it. >> >>> >> >>> What do folks think about releasing 1.7.8 vs. 1.8.0? There are very >> >>> few changes in the 1.7 branch, so it might be best to release 1.8.0 >> >>> from trunk. There have been enough changes to justify a new minor >> >>> release I think. Are there any drawbacks to doing that? >> >>> >> >>> The unresolved 1.8.0 issues are here: >> >>> >> >>> http://s.apache.org/Cdt >> >>> >> >>> And the unresolved 1.7.8 issues are here: >> >>> >> >>> http://s.apache.org/5ShO >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Tom >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, >> >> >> >> Niels Basjes >> > > > > -- > Sean -- Thomas Sanchez