Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avro-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45130 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 18:46:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 18:46:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 78216 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:46:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-avro-dev-archive@avro.apache.org Received: (qmail 78061 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:46:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avro.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@avro.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avro.apache.org Received: (qmail 78053 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 18:46:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:46:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:46:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 45078 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 18:45:50 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.144]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:45:50 +0000 Message-ID: <4D5EBE5C.5010201@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:45:48 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@avro.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.5 release References: <4D5D7879.1000207@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 02/18/2011 10:23 AM, Douglas Creager wrote: > I've marked several of the C library issues as blockers, and marked them as targets for 1.5. They have patches uploaded already, and the existing test cases all pass, so hopefully they just need another pair of eyes to look for glaring errors before they can be committed. Great! Can Bruce, Matt or someone else familiar with the C implementation please have a look at these? Thanks, Doug