Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-avro-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61519 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2010 01:53:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2010 01:53:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 90385 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 01:53:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-avro-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90313 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2010 01:53:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avro-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90300 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2010 01:53:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:53:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:53:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9FA29A001A for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:53:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <546547462.138601265680408111.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 01:53:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Massie (JIRA)" To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AVRO-341) specify avro transport in spec In-Reply-To: <535970707.273791263587454485.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831249#action_12831249 ] Matt Massie commented on AVRO-341: ---------------------------------- Todd> look at the avro session as a state machine that flip flops between "control plane" messages and "user data plane" messages Sounds good to me. The service number rules at the end of my message sort of speaks to that separation. We need to tease out the details to do it better. Doug> OSI terminology is not a priority for me. If it is for you, then please propose a patch updating the spec and all of the implementations. If the team agrees on different terminology, I will happily do the search/replace. Being consistent is important I agree, but it would be ideal to be consistent with the wider community outside of Avro. Doug> Except the Wikipedia page says that HTTP is at the application level http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model . RPC is listed as a Layer 5 (Session) example. HTTP is correctly at the Application level but this Jira is about RPC and not HTTP. > specify avro transport in spec > ------------------------------ > > Key: AVRO-341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-341 > Project: Avro > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: spec > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > We should develop a high-performance, secure, transport for Avro. This should be named with avro: uris. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.