Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-avro-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11697 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2009 03:00:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2009 03:00:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 97655 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 03:00:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-avro-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97559 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 03:00:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avro-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97549 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2009 03:00:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:00:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:00:39 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE25234C045 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:00:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <939955765.1261364418888.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:00:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AVRO-258) Higher-level language for authoring schemata In-Reply-To: <1959352664.1261125678080.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793065#action_12793065 ] Todd Lipcon commented on AVRO-258: ---------------------------------- Thanks for the input, guys. bq. We could make the properties, key-value: string name sort=ignore future=property I'm not a huge fan of this because it makes user-properties intermix with language constructors in a non-clearly-defined way. But I don't feel that strongly - anyone else have some opinions? bq. The only addition I'd like to add to the grammar is to support optional fields in records Definitely +1. I was planning on using the keyword "nullable" instead of "optional" since to me "optional" seems to indicate a ternary state possibility (ie unset, set to null, and set to something else). But in general I like that kind of syntactic sugar. > Higher-level language for authoring schemata > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: AVRO-258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-258 > Project: Avro > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: spec > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: AVRO-258.txt, simple-genned.avpr, simple.avpr > > > Early users of Avro have noted that authoring schemas and especially protocols in JSON feels unnatural. This JIRA is to work on a higher-level language that feels more like defining interfaces and classes in Java/C/etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.