avro-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AVRO-80) 'reflect' implementation requires Avro classes to define types
Date Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:38:31 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762937#action_12762937

Sharad Agarwal commented on AVRO-80:

I think there should be a default and easy way to work with Strings. I came across couple
of instances where potential users enquired about this and this limitation deterred them to
use Avro.
Should we make the reflect *default* representation of String schema as java.lang.String itself?
I agree that performance is the concern but I think for reflect that trade-off is fine.

> 'reflect' implementation requires Avro classes to define types
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: AVRO-80
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-80
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java
>            Reporter: Sharad Agarwal
> Since 'reflect' implementation is expected to work with existing code, it should work
with java types. For example it should work with java String instead of org.apache.avro.util.Utf8.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message