avro-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Amr Awadallah <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: who's doing what for 0.21?
Date Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:19:46 GMT
CCing avro-dev@ to comment, but my understanding is that it is currently 
functioning and way superior to the alternatives you mention below :)

-- amr

Andrew Purtell wrote:
> I my opinion, we should not bother to wait for Avro. I've been hearing
> about it on and off for three months now. If it is ready the day we
> start work on 1015 for 0.21, and it fits the bill, fine, but otherwise
> we should just use Thrift or pbufs. Thrift may be preferable as its
> compact binary protocol is competitive with pbufs plus it has a fully
> implemented async rpc stack. I think this applies for both 1015 and
> 1295. Also I'm skeptical that something to supplant RMI won't have
> overheads related to that we don't need, e.g. transmitting class and
> method names as strings, etc. 
>
>    - Andy
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) <Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com>
> To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:26:58 PM
> Subject: RE: who's doing what for 0.21?
>
> I am also interested in 1295 (I have quite a bit of experience
> with cross data center replication), but more interested in
> getting more of the master into zookeeper.
>
> As for 1556, I might wait a bit. At the Cloudera off-site, one
> of the things talked about was doing something similar for
> Hadoop which we might leverage.
>
> What really needs to get done around builds is when you mark
> a Jira as patch available, we should do a patch build and test
> like Hadoop does. Noone has had time to do it to date, but if
> you are taking on the build, that would be a "nice to have".
>
> For 1015, should you wait for Avro?
>
> And if you missed it, here are the notes from the Cloudera off-site:
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/DeveloperOffsite20090612
>
> ---
> Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation)
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurtell@apache.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:11 PM
>> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: who's doing what for 0.21?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/m7nt72
>>
>> I have an interest in these:
>>
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1015
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1295
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1556
>>
>> I think for 1015 and 1295, there is interest on the part of at least
>> myself,
>> dj_ryan, and jgray. dj_ryan was saying something about su executives
>> making
>> 1295 a priority for him. We should figure out how to divide up and
>> assign
>> out the work.
>>
>> Also, probably I'll end up taking on the grunt work of 1556, because
>> it
>> needs to be done.
>>
>> Have we set a time and place for the next dev meeting?
>>
>>    - Andy
>>
>>     
>
>
>       
>   

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message