Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-phoenix-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 36866 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 04:56:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 04:56:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 21384 invoked by uid 97); 4 Dec 2002 04:57:19 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 21335 invoked by uid 97); 4 Dec 2002 04:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 21291 invoked by uid 98); 4 Dec 2002 04:57:16 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3DED8696.5080107@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 23:37:42 -0500 From: Berin Loritsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: How to move forward? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N We need to make a branch in CVS to seperate new development from maintenance efforts on the old framework. The question is do we make the 4.1 code the branch and continue new efforts in the CVS HEAD or vice versa. Thoughts? --------------------------------------------- Introducing NetZero Long Distance 1st month Free! Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: