Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-phoenix-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 17375 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2002 17:40:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 17:40:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 17818 invoked by uid 97); 25 Sep 2002 17:28:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16866 invoked by uid 97); 25 Sep 2002 17:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-phoenix-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 12296 invoked by uid 98); 25 Sep 2002 17:25:57 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: <3D91F078.9070405@avaintec.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:20:56 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johan_Sj=F6berg?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon-Phoenix Developers List Subject: Re: Phoenix work directory References: <3D906E58.7010405@avaintec.com> <200209252253.52929.peter@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Peter Donald wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:53, Johan Sj�berg wrote: > >>in your proposal for the work directory (in Bugzilla) you mentioned that >>it should be removed on startup as it still includes the temporary >>directories if Phoenix was uncleanly shutdown. Will this be added at >>some point, > > > Just added it then. Could you test it out. It seems to work fine under linux > and win2000 but then again I could not reproduce the bug ;) I'll test it ASAP, but I can't see any changes in the CVS. Hmm. perhaps my computer is playing tricks with me again. I think we need to patch another thing before I can test ;) I'll get back with that... do you use JDK 1.4 btw? Seems like someone added a "new Exception( aString, oldException ); somewhere. I'm looking into this now. The bug/problem: If you can't reproduce it something is strange here... Ugh these windows versions! // J -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: