Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-phoenix-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 24096 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2002 12:59:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2002 12:59:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19421 invoked by uid 97); 6 Sep 2002 12:59:38 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19406 invoked by uid 97); 6 Sep 2002 12:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-phoenix-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19394 invoked by uid 98); 6 Sep 2002 12:59:37 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Donald To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Subject: Re: More configurable SystemManager. Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 23:02:33 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <004401c25493$606b84e0$5eb2c4d3@nervous> <011301c2558f$1f9359f0$5eb2c4d3@nervous> In-Reply-To: <011301c2558f$1f9359f0$5eb2c4d3@nervous> X-Wisdom: A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200209062302.33332.peter@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Looks interesting. Would you mind doing 2 things. Separate out the "scrip= t"=20 execution part into another component (so we can reuse it elsewhere. And = also=20 create a ScriptableSystemManager (as per last mail) so we can retain=20 compatability with existing manager. The ScriptableSystemManager may be as simple as class ScriptableSystemManager ... { void initialize() { JMXScripter scripter =3D new JMXScripter(); scripter.execute( configuration ); } } Like? On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 20:21, Eung-ju Park wrote: > I implement it. Yeah :) > > * More powerful configuration. > * Maybe easy to port another JMX impelemtation( I don't know about oth= er > JMX implementation. It is just my presumption.) > * Break backward compatiblility > * It is JMX specific configuration scheme. I think other kind of > SystemManager need another configuration scheme. > > I don't know how to test with RMI Adaptor. RMI Adaptor is not tested. > > Diff is attached. And it require excalibur-convertor. Try it! > > commit it? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eung-ju Park" > To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2= 002 > 1:19 PM > Subject: More configurable SystemManager. > > > Current MX4JSystemManager configuration is not flexible. > > I don't know about JMX. But I think below form of configuration bring= s > > more > > > power to SystemManager. > > JBoss's configuration has similar form. > > I don't know below form is correct or incorrect. Please comment to me= =2E :) > > > > > logger=3D"manager"> > > > class=3D"mx4j.adaptor.http.HttpAdaptor"> > > > 8082 > > > type=3D"javax.management.ObjectName">Http:name=3DXSLTProcessor > > > > > > > > mx4j > > mx4j > > > > > > > > > > > class=3D"mx4j.adaptor.http.XSLTProcessor"> > > > type=3D"java.lang.String">stylesheet.xsl > > false > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > --=20 Cheers, Peter Donald Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, and a dark side, and it binds the universe together ... -- Carl Zwanzig=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: