Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-phoenix-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74679 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2002 01:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2002 01:48:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 15612 invoked by uid 97); 7 Sep 2002 01:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15570 invoked by uid 97); 7 Sep 2002 01:48:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-phoenix-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15558 invoked by uid 98); 7 Sep 2002 01:48:47 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 21:46:02 -0400 From: "David W." Subject: Re: More configurable SystemManager. To: Avalon-Phoenix Developers List Message-id: <001301c25610$57b76f20$c600a8c0@dellinspiron> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <004401c25493$606b84e0$5eb2c4d3@nervous> <001501c2553a$c2dcf580$5eb2c4d3@nervous> <001901c25552$552eb9c0$c600a8c0@dellinspiron> <200209070032.57193.peter@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Peter Donald wrote > > I'd be content, in the short term at least, to see more descriptive > > versions of the same thing (i.e. instead of > > number to configure the http adaptor, > > number) until JMX configuration is given > > full consideration. > > If you could spec it out fully then I can do that. I just updated the > kernel.xml to show all permutations possible. So if you could show me what > you would change then that would be great. The MX4J adaptors should probably be marked as MX4J-specific. This seems brief but descriptive: I don't think the fact the the naming factory currently used by default supports RMI is particularly important -- am I wrong? I figure the configuration for naming should be more generic. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: