Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-phoenix-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 65834 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2002 07:45:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2002 07:45:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 14728 invoked by uid 97); 18 Aug 2002 07:46:18 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14695 invoked by uid 97); 18 Aug 2002 07:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-phoenix-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14672 invoked by uid 98); 18 Aug 2002 07:46:16 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Donald To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Subject: Re: PR9270 Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 17:48:11 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <004501c245fa$c16075a0$5eb2c4d3@nervous> <200208181722.37933.peter@apache.org> <3D5F4DA7.4000208@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3D5F4DA7.4000208@apache.org> X-Wisdom: A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200208181748.11074.peter@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 17:32, Stephen McConnell wrote: > >You have stated that Merlin can read the CK DTD so there should be no > > problem about interoperability. Any component that wants to interoper= ate > > will use the CK DTD. > > Only as a subset. > Promoting containerkit DTD means that your obliging ever other containe= r > to handle the special case of the blockinfo DTD and the containerkit DT= D > while Phoenix conviniently ignores the Type DTD. Would it not be more > efficient if we all used the same DTD? It would be more efficient but it is unlikely to happen while you want to= =20 support stages/extensions. Removing them will basically end up with CK DT= D.=20 Thus I don't really see any issue with using the CK DTD. The components w= hich=20 need to be interoperable will use it, those that don't - wont. --=20 Cheers, Peter Donald ---------------------------------------------- Money is how people with no talent keep score. ----------------------------------------------=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: