Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-phoenix-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 3457 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 10:42:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 10:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 26331 invoked by uid 97); 14 Aug 2002 10:42:50 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26285 invoked by uid 97); 14 Aug 2002 10:42:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-phoenix-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26273 invoked by uid 98); 14 Aug 2002 10:42:48 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Peter Royal To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Subject: Re: Xalan Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:39:31 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <3D59F346.8000803@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <3D59F346.8000803@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200208140639.31516.proyal@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday 14 August 2002 02:05 am, Paul Hammant wrote: > Does anyone have any opinions as to suitability for inclusion in > Phoenix's CVS? Does the D1 suffix inply alpha status? "Developers Release", which may be more akin to a beta. I have no problems with inclusion (I'm using that version over here with Phoenix already :) -pete -- peter royal -> proyal@apache.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: