Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-avalon-phoenix-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 6428 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2002 11:33:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2002 11:33:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 12239 invoked by uid 97); 30 Jul 2002 11:33:27 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 12223 invoked by uid 97); 30 Jul 2002 11:33:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact avalon-phoenix-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list avalon-phoenix-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 12211 invoked by uid 98); 30 Jul 2002 11:33:26 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Peter Donald To: "Avalon-Phoenix Developers List" Subject: Re: Drop support for JMX RI? Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 21:34:14 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020730140732.01ba57b0@mail.optushome.com.au> <5.1.0.14.2.20020730143230.01bc7e50@www.stocksoftware.com.au> <200207300640.10492.proyal@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <200207300640.10492.proyal@apache.org> X-Wisdom: A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200207302134.14042.peter@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:40, Peter Royal wrote: > On Tuesday 30 July 2002 01:34 am, Peter Donald wrote: > > Actually I think we will end up moving Huws stuff back into baxter so > > that we can describe MBeans using xml descriptors. > > Do you have a timeframe for this? I was thinking of maybe applying his > patches to Phoenix later this week. I have already applied this locally to phoenix but had some problems that= =20 basically arose because the RI is buggy. Hence why I have not committed i= t=20 yet. I can commit it away but the RI will not work (so we need to delete = it=20 completely). Anyways - up to you. Huw is going to work on one more problem (wrt to pro= blems=20 unregistering MBeans) but other than that it seems all good. --=20 Cheers, Peter Donald *--------------------------------* | Every rule has an exception, | | except the rule of exceptions. | *--------------------------------*=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: