Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50208 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2004 00:26:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2004 00:26:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 2696 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2004 00:26:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 2637 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2004 00:26:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 2622 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2004 00:26:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [66.163.169.223] (HELO smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:26:50 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.103?) (jaaronfarr@69.40.183.194 with plain) by smtp104.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2004 00:26:49 -0000 Message-ID: <40F32C48.4020003@apache.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:26:48 -0400 From: J Aaron Farr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: Avalon Versions References: <03334AAF1DF8D2119B1000A0C9E32F58065EFEF5@us-pb-xmsg-2.am.sony.com> <40F30305.10805@hedhman.org> <40F30A6B.40101@hedhman.org> <40F315D8.3030409@hedhman.org> <40F31FFF.7020406@apache.org> <40F32A5D.5060104@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <40F32A5D.5060104@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N J Aaron Farr wrote: > Stephen McConnell wrote: > >> Leo Sutic wrote: >> >>> Perhaps we should then just mark AF >= 4.2 as AvalonPlanetBranch/HEAD >>> and AF < 4.2 as OldOldOldBranch. >> >> >> >> No need you already have tags that distinguish 4.1 and 4.2. If you >> branch of the last version of 4.1 which was 4.1.3 from memory and >> apply the config changes you have a 4.1.4 which would be identical to >> 4.2.0 - except for the namespace. > > > But apparently 4.2.0 is not *identical* to 4.1.4 because 4.2.0 documents > claim incorporation of things like constructor injection which clearly > isn't supported by just the avalon-framework-4.2.0.jar. I should add this is exactly why a 4.1.x branch should be established, or better yet rerelease 4.2.0 as 5.0.0. jaaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org