Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81496 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 20:21:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 20:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 39470 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2004 20:21:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 39425 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2004 20:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 39412 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 20:21:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.69) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 20:21:31 -0000 Received: from franklin ([68.19.226.169]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040317202135.EZFD9700.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@franklin> for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:21:35 -0500 From: "Alex Karasulu" To: "'Avalon Developers List'" Subject: RE: excalibur thread update Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:21:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcQMWr2NvGDP3BwHRyCQuaP9SWNFsgAAbPsg Message-Id: <20040317202135.EZFD9700.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@franklin> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > I think he is the only one currently with objections. I don't > > want him to be pressured into it. > > I don't want him to feel unduly pressured, but I don't really see that we > have much choice. This isn't a matter of wanting to use a new toy or I agree now with you after seeing Leif's email, which arrived after I had sent the above. Now that it's a matter of loosing history this is no longer a matter of preference. The history is something we owe to all contributors and I think Niclas will appreciate that. > implement some agenda. Refactoring and CVS are incompatible. We need > Subversion to be able to carry out the desired changes without > disconnecting > code from history. It is as fundemental as that. This is a major reason > why Subversion was created. Yes absolutely. Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org