avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: More "academic" ideas [Was: [VOTE] New sandbox project]
Date Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:15:34 GMT
J Aaron Farr wrote:

> 
> ...... Original Message .......
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:33:13 -0700 "Jonathan Hawkes" <jhawkes@adsnm.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>>>- Concerns like Creation/LogEnabling/Service/Initialize should have a
>>
>>order
>>
>>>of execution.
>>
>>They do.  Concerns are evaluated in the order they are added to the
>>container.
>>
> 
> 
> I agree.  I think this would be a simplier and more natural method.   It 
> would also allow for the user to customize the lifecycle easily.
> 
> But what about shutdown lifecycles?  There would need to be a distinction.

Just a thought - instead of looking at "shutdown" as a Concern within a 
queue, I figure one should adding a Startable concern - where the 
concern handles deployment and undeployment (starting and stopping 
respectively) in a sequence with other concerns.

Cheers, Steve.

-- 

|------------------------------------------------|
| Magic by Merlin                                |
| Production by Avalon                           |
|                                                |
| http://avalon.apache.org/merlin                |
| http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest    |
|------------------------------------------------|

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org


Mime
View raw message