avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia - SPO)" <hamilton.olive...@agenciaclick.com.br>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MutableConfiguration interface
Date Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:04:45 GMT
I don't see any harm or problem adding this interface to framework. No
container will crash, no users will shout in panic. A Reconfigurable
semantic is another issue that deserves another discussion. 

By now, the addition of this interface seems ok.

Remember that a -1 is a VETO and that is IMO a bit radical position to take.


regards,
hammett

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:niclas@hedhman.org]

Although I need this sort of mechanism myself, I am not supportive of this 
proposal in its current form, and feel a vote is a bit pre-mature,
especially 
since it involves Framework.

-1.

IMHO, I think this should be bundled with nailing down the Reconfigurable() 
semantics and life cycle as well.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org


Mime
View raw message