avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ulrich Mayring <u...@denic.de>
Subject Re: [proposal] IoC type 3.14 extension to the Avalon Framework
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:14:30 GMT
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> 
> Not having an opinion about his proposal at large (yet), your counter argument 
> is a bit bleak. Ever heard of methods ;o) ?
> 
> public class Abc
> {
>     public Abc( Configuration conf, ServiceManager man )
>         throws Exception
>     {
>         configure( conf );
>         service( man );
>     }
> }
> 
> Would that be so much different from what you are doing now?

Of course it would. I cannot control the order in which the lifecycle 
stages are called, for example, or even their names.

> AND, you don't have to use what he is suggesting, right?? If you like the 
> strict cycle (like I do, still), stick with it... But if we get access to 
> more components, i.e. components written in more neutral ways, I am +1 for 
> that.

Curious: what does "more neutral" mean in this context?

Ulrich



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org


Mime
View raw message