Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-26387-apmail-avalon-dev-archive=avalon.apache.org@avalon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62495 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 06:51:55 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 06:51:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 28042 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2003 06:51:40 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27973 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2003 06:51:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@avalon.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@avalon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@avalon.apache.org>
List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" <dev.avalon.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" <dev@avalon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27958 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 06:51:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO f2.hedhman.org) (202.187.40.8)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 06:51:39 -0000
Received: from f2.hedhman.org (f2.hedhman.org [127.0.0.1])
	by f2.hedhman.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8O6pU3X028148
	for <dev@avalon.apache.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:51:44 +0800
From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org>
Organization: Private
To: dev@avalon.apache.org
Subject: .xinfo
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:51:29 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200309241451.29436.niclas@hedhman.org>
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


Hi,

The .xinfo files that Phoenix expect have a different format from the ones 
that Merlin expect (or so the documentation says).

Merlin;
<type>
  <info>
    <name>simple</name>
    <version>1.0.0</version>
    <lifestyle>singleton</lifestyle>
  </info>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency key="random" type="tutorial.RandomGenerator" version="1.0.0"/>
    <dependency type="tutorial.Identifiable"/>
  </dependencies>
</type>


Phoenix;
<blockinfo>
    <block>
        <version>1.2.3</version>
    </block>
    <services>
        <service name="com.biz.cornerstone.services.MyService"
                 version="2.1.3" />
    </services>
    <dependencies>
        <dependency>
            <role>com.biz.cornerstone.services.Authorizer</role>
            <service name="com.biz.cornerstone.service.Authorizer"
                     version="1.2"/>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <!-- note that role is not specified and defaults
                 to name of service. The service version is not
                 specified and it defaults to "1.0" -->
            <service name="com.biz.cornerstone.service.RoleMapper"/>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>
</blockinfo>


Shouldn't these be the same?
If not, how come this is not part of Avalon Framework specification from the 
beginning?

Niclas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org