avalon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leo Simons <leosim...@apache.org>
Subject Re: exCornerstone components.
Date Mon, 23 Jun 2003 12:48:24 GMT
Paul Hammant wrote:
> I think you worry too much.

probably :D. It is better to worry up front than complain in retrospect!

> There would be no use of the word Pico in the codebase of
> exCornerstone.

ah, I renamed half of my bad example to ***Bean already:

ConnectionManagerBean extends DefaultConnectionManager
     public ConnectionManagerBean( /* ... stuff goes here ... */ )
         /** ... stuff goes here ... */

there would be the need for an added constructor in either an existing 
class or a new class, right? And that constructor would need to be 
changed whenever a dependency is added, right?

> I don't think you need to worry about Avalon users using the constructor directly.

my thought was about people that use neither pico nor avalon but just 
need a reusable bean. One of the good things about pico is that you're 
also making that a real possibility, innit?

> Pico users will have to just accept that there might be changes.

that's a bit of a policy change for how we currently try to do things 
:D. Not saying that's neccessarily a bad thing here.

anyways, no -1 here, but no +1 yet either.

gotta run!


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org

View raw message