Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-avalon-dev-archive@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 28079 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2003 14:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@avalon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Avalon Developers List" Reply-To: "Avalon Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@avalon.apache.org Received: (qmail 28009 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2003 14:28:42 -0000 Received: from onramp.i95.net (205.177.132.17) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2003 14:28:42 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([66.208.12.130]) by onramp.i95.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3EEShwT023625 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:28:43 -0400 Message-ID: <3E9AC59A.3060902@apache.org> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:28:42 -0400 From: Berin Loritsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List Subject: Re: avalon-framework **Util.java References: <000a01c30020$782e2770$0801a8c0@Lagrange> <200304112324.55655.peter@realityforge.org> <200304120857.06939.peter@realityforge.org> <200304150028.08875.peter@realityforge.org> In-Reply-To: <200304150028.08875.peter@realityforge.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Peter Donald wrote: > No comment ? Just do it? How do you propose doing it without breaking compatibility? > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 08:57, Peter Donald wrote: > >>On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:24, Peter Donald wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:08, Berin Loritsch wrote: >>> >>>>Peter Donald wrote: >>>> >>>>>maybe. I would still just go the path of separating out things that >>>>>needed separation due to external dependencies as many of my >>>>>components use what would be considered "impl" parts. >>>>> >>>>>What we could do is migrate the Logkit adapter into the Logkit >>>>>project and ask Log4j to host the Log4j adapter. Then we are left >>>>>with just the XML deps which disapear as a problem in JDK1.4. >>>> >>>>The only problem with that approach is the circular dependency. >>> >>>thats a short-term problem. Maybe we should look at solving this over the >>>longer term? > > -- "You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, The Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the US of arrogance, and Germany doesn't want to go to war. And the 3 most powerful men in America are named 'Bush', 'Dick', and 'Colon' (sic)". -----Chris Rock --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org